The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - Self-Report. An analysis of its structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample

被引:79
作者
Richter, Jorg [1 ]
Sagatun, Ase [1 ]
Heyerdahl, Sonja [1 ]
Oppedal, Brit [2 ]
Roysamb, Espen [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Child & Adolescent Mental Hlth Eastern & So N, N-0405 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Self-report SDQ; factor structure; CFA; adolescents; ethnic minorities; CHILD MENTAL-HEALTH; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; BEHAVIORAL-PROBLEMS; REPORT VERSION; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; DISORDER; REFUGEE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02372.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Background: The SDQ is currently one of the internationally most frequently used screening instruments for child and adolescent mental health purposes. However, its structure, cross-cultural equivalence, and its applicability in ethnic minority groups is still a matter of discussion. Methods: SDQ self-report data of 5,379 ethnic Norwegian and 865 ethnic minority adolescents with a variety of national origins was analysed by means of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Multi-group comparisons considering equal thresholds combined with more in-depth analyses on factor loadings, residuals, composite reliability, and average amount of variance explained by indicators of respective constructs were performed. Results: CFA suggested a good fit of the five-factor model of the SDQ self-report in the subsample of ethnic Norwegian adolescents and an acceptable fit in ethnic minority subsamples without substantial differences between ethnic Norwegian SDQ data and data of Pakistani or those of 'other ethnic minority' adolescents. When assuming equal thresholds between response categories of the items as well as equal factor loadings the structure in the data significantly differed between ethnic Norwegian and both ethnic minority samples. Some factor loadings and some correlations between constructs significantly differed between ethnic Norwegian and both ethnic minority samples. The correlation coefficients between the hyperactivity factor and the conduct problems factor were too high in all three subsamples in order to establish distinct constructs. Composite reliability and average explained variance of the emotional symptoms factor were good in all samples, whereas they were low for some of the other factors. Conclusions: To some extent the theoretically proposed five-factor structure of the Norwegian version of the SDQ self-report was supported in 15- to 16-year-old adolescents. However, the results of more detailed analyses raise questions about the interpretation of some subscales. When applying this screening method to Norwegian adolescents, our results suggest that the use of the total difficulty score of the SDQ in screening youth should be preferred over the subscale scores.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1011
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using the Dutch multi-informant Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to predict adolescent psychiatric diagnoses
    Vugteveen, J.
    De Bildt, A.
    Hartman, C. A.
    Timmerman, M. E.
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 27 (10) : 1347 - 1359
  • [32] Factor Structure of the Self-Report Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Diverse US Sample
    Graybill, Emily
    Roach, Andrew
    Barger, Brian
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2021, 43 (02) : 388 - 398
  • [33] Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting
    Becker, Andreas
    Wang, Biyao
    Kunze, Barbara
    Otto, Christiane
    Schlack, Robert
    Hoelling, Heike
    Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike
    Klasen, Fionna
    Rogge, Jana
    Isensee, Corinna
    Rothenberger, Aribert
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KINDER-UND JUGENDPSYCHIATRIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2018, 46 (06): : 523 - 533
  • [34] The psychosocial functioning in adolescents with severe obesity evaluated throughout the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): a preliminary report
    Usubini, Anna Guerrini
    Bottacchi, Michela
    Morelli, Giovanna
    Caroli, Diana
    Marazzi, Nicoletta
    Castelnuovo, Gianluca
    Sartorio, Alessandro
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [35] Age Appropriateness of the Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Black, Louise
    Mansfield, Rosie
    Panayiotou, Margarita
    ASSESSMENT, 2021, 28 (06) : 1556 - 1569
  • [36] Normative data and psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in an Iranian community sample
    Shahrivar, Zahra
    Tehrani-Doost, Mehdi
    Pakbaz, Bahareh
    Rezaie, Azita
    Ahmadi, Fatemeh
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 14 (02): : 69 - 77
  • [37] Psychometric properties of the Arabic self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire
    Emam, Mahmoud Mohamed
    Abu Hilal, Maher M.
    Kazem, Ali Mandi
    Alkharousi, Suad Juma
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2016, 59 : 211 - 220
  • [38] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: the factor structure in a sample of Korean immigrant parents in New Zealand
    Lee, Boram
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 28 (04) : 429 - 435
  • [39] Measuring adolescent mental health around the globe: psychometric properties of the self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in South Africa, and comparison with UK, Australian and Chinese data
    de Vries, P. J.
    Davids, E. L.
    Mathews, C.
    Aaro, L. E.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2018, 27 (04) : 369 - 380
  • [40] Greek Validation of the Factor Structure and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Self Report (SDQ-SR): Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling
    Rapson Gomez
    Frosso Motti-Stefanidi
    Scott Jordan
    Vasileios Stavropoulos
    Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2021, 52 : 880 - 890