The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - Self-Report. An analysis of its structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample

被引:79
|
作者
Richter, Jorg [1 ]
Sagatun, Ase [1 ]
Heyerdahl, Sonja [1 ]
Oppedal, Brit [2 ]
Roysamb, Espen [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Child & Adolescent Mental Hlth Eastern & So N, N-0405 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Self-report SDQ; factor structure; CFA; adolescents; ethnic minorities; CHILD MENTAL-HEALTH; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; BEHAVIORAL-PROBLEMS; REPORT VERSION; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; DISORDER; REFUGEE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02372.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Background: The SDQ is currently one of the internationally most frequently used screening instruments for child and adolescent mental health purposes. However, its structure, cross-cultural equivalence, and its applicability in ethnic minority groups is still a matter of discussion. Methods: SDQ self-report data of 5,379 ethnic Norwegian and 865 ethnic minority adolescents with a variety of national origins was analysed by means of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Multi-group comparisons considering equal thresholds combined with more in-depth analyses on factor loadings, residuals, composite reliability, and average amount of variance explained by indicators of respective constructs were performed. Results: CFA suggested a good fit of the five-factor model of the SDQ self-report in the subsample of ethnic Norwegian adolescents and an acceptable fit in ethnic minority subsamples without substantial differences between ethnic Norwegian SDQ data and data of Pakistani or those of 'other ethnic minority' adolescents. When assuming equal thresholds between response categories of the items as well as equal factor loadings the structure in the data significantly differed between ethnic Norwegian and both ethnic minority samples. Some factor loadings and some correlations between constructs significantly differed between ethnic Norwegian and both ethnic minority samples. The correlation coefficients between the hyperactivity factor and the conduct problems factor were too high in all three subsamples in order to establish distinct constructs. Composite reliability and average explained variance of the emotional symptoms factor were good in all samples, whereas they were low for some of the other factors. Conclusions: To some extent the theoretically proposed five-factor structure of the Norwegian version of the SDQ self-report was supported in 15- to 16-year-old adolescents. However, the results of more detailed analyses raise questions about the interpretation of some subscales. When applying this screening method to Norwegian adolescents, our results suggest that the use of the total difficulty score of the SDQ in screening youth should be preferred over the subscale scores.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1011
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Early Evidence of the Italian Parent-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-P)
    Jian-Bin Li
    Elisa Delvecchio
    Daniela Di Riso
    Adriana Lis
    Silvia Salcuni
    Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2017, 48 : 335 - 345
  • [22] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Factor Structure and Gender Equivalence in Norwegian Adolescents
    Boe, Tormod
    Hysing, Mari
    Skogen, Jens Christoffer
    Breivik, Kyrre
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05):
  • [23] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): the Factor Structure and Scale Validation in U.S. Adolescents
    He, Jian-Ping
    Burstein, Marcy
    Schmitz, Anja
    Merikangas, Kathleen R.
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 41 (04) : 583 - 595
  • [24] Clinical Utility of the Parent-Report Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Latvian Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Practice
    Bezborodovs, Nikita
    Kocane, Arta
    Rancans, Elmars
    Villerusa, Anita
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (11):
  • [25] Responsiveness of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in a Sample of High-Risk Youth in Residential Treatment
    Mason, W. Alex
    Chmelka, Mary B.
    Thompson, Ronald W.
    CHILD & YOUTH CARE FORUM, 2012, 41 (05) : 479 - 492
  • [26] Testing competing models of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire's (SDQ's) factor structure for the parent-informant instrument
    McCrory, Cathal
    Layte, Richard
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 52 (08) : 882 - 887
  • [27] Psychometric Properties of the Self-Report Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Korea
    Kim, Min-Hyuk
    Ahn, Joung-Sook
    Min, Seongho
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 12 (04) : 491 - 499
  • [28] Normative data for the self-reported and parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for ages 12-17
    Vugteveen, Jorien
    de Bildt, Annelies
    Timmerman, Marieke E.
    CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY AND MENTAL HEALTH, 2022, 16 (01)
  • [29] Factor structure of the parent-rated strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a sample of Canadian children from military families
    Coulthard, Julie
    Sudom, Kerry
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [30] Effects of Telephone Versus Paper-and-Pencil Self-Administration of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Child and Adolescent Outpatients: Evidence From Iran
    Shahrivar, Zahra
    Sharifi, Vandad
    Zarafshan, Hadi
    Khademi, Mojgan
    Nia, Morteza Jafari
    Hajebi, Ahmad
    Shahreza, Farid Abolhassani
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (04)