The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - Self-Report. An analysis of its structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample

被引:79
|
作者
Richter, Jorg [1 ]
Sagatun, Ase [1 ]
Heyerdahl, Sonja [1 ]
Oppedal, Brit [2 ]
Roysamb, Espen [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Child & Adolescent Mental Hlth Eastern & So N, N-0405 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Self-report SDQ; factor structure; CFA; adolescents; ethnic minorities; CHILD MENTAL-HEALTH; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; BEHAVIORAL-PROBLEMS; REPORT VERSION; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; DISORDER; REFUGEE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02372.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Background: The SDQ is currently one of the internationally most frequently used screening instruments for child and adolescent mental health purposes. However, its structure, cross-cultural equivalence, and its applicability in ethnic minority groups is still a matter of discussion. Methods: SDQ self-report data of 5,379 ethnic Norwegian and 865 ethnic minority adolescents with a variety of national origins was analysed by means of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Multi-group comparisons considering equal thresholds combined with more in-depth analyses on factor loadings, residuals, composite reliability, and average amount of variance explained by indicators of respective constructs were performed. Results: CFA suggested a good fit of the five-factor model of the SDQ self-report in the subsample of ethnic Norwegian adolescents and an acceptable fit in ethnic minority subsamples without substantial differences between ethnic Norwegian SDQ data and data of Pakistani or those of 'other ethnic minority' adolescents. When assuming equal thresholds between response categories of the items as well as equal factor loadings the structure in the data significantly differed between ethnic Norwegian and both ethnic minority samples. Some factor loadings and some correlations between constructs significantly differed between ethnic Norwegian and both ethnic minority samples. The correlation coefficients between the hyperactivity factor and the conduct problems factor were too high in all three subsamples in order to establish distinct constructs. Composite reliability and average explained variance of the emotional symptoms factor were good in all samples, whereas they were low for some of the other factors. Conclusions: To some extent the theoretically proposed five-factor structure of the Norwegian version of the SDQ self-report was supported in 15- to 16-year-old adolescents. However, the results of more detailed analyses raise questions about the interpretation of some subscales. When applying this screening method to Norwegian adolescents, our results suggest that the use of the total difficulty score of the SDQ in screening youth should be preferred over the subscale scores.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1011
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in India
    Sheel, Hina
    Suarez, Lidia
    Marsh, Nigel V.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2025, 43 (03) : 296 - 309
  • [2] Greek Validation of the Factor Structure and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Self Report (SDQ-SR): Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling
    Gomez, Rapson
    Motti-Stefanidi, Frosso
    Jordan, Scott
    Stavropoulos, Vasileios
    CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 52 (05) : 880 - 890
  • [3] The German Self-Report Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu-S): Psychometric Properties, Factor Structure, and Critical Values
    Lohbeck, Annette
    Schultheiss, Jan
    Petermann, Franz
    Petermann, Ulrike
    DIAGNOSTICA, 2015, 61 (04): : 222 - 235
  • [4] Validity Aspects of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Adolescent Self-Report and Parent-Report Versions Among Dutch Adolescents
    Vugteveen, Jorien
    de Bildt, Annelies
    Theunissen, Meinou
    Reijneveld, Sijmen A.
    Timmerman, Marieke
    ASSESSMENT, 2021, 28 (02) : 601 - 616
  • [5] Psychometric properties of the French version of the self-report and teacher Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
    Capron, Christiane
    Therond, Carine
    Duyme, Michel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2007, 23 (02) : 79 - 88
  • [6] Factor analysis of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a sample of children with intellectual disability
    Haynes, Allison
    Gilmore, Linda
    Shochet, Ian
    Campbell, Marilyn
    Roberts, Clare
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2013, 34 (02) : 847 - 854
  • [7] A Confirmatory Approach to Examining the Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): A Large Scale Cohort Study
    Janni Niclasen
    Anne Mette Skovgaard
    Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen
    Mikael Julius Sømhovd
    Carsten Obel
    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2013, 41 : 355 - 365
  • [8] Assessing the factor structure of the Spanish language parent Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Honduras
    Harry, Melissa L.
    Acevedo, Jose
    Crea, Thomas M.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [9] A Confirmatory Approach to Examining the Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): A Large Scale Cohort Study
    Niclasen, Janni
    Skovgaard, Anne Mette
    Andersen, Anne-Marie Nybo
    Somhovd, Mikael Julius
    Obel, Carsten
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 41 (03) : 355 - 365
  • [10] Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Adolescent Community and Clinical Populations
    Vugteveen, Jorien
    de Bildt, Annelies
    Serra, Marike
    de Wolff, Marianne S.
    Timmerman, Marieke E.
    ASSESSMENT, 2020, 27 (07) : 1476 - 1489