Using key component profiles for the evaluation of program implementation in intensive mental health case management

被引:12
作者
Cousins, JB
Aubry, TD
Fowler, HS
Smith, M
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Fac Educ, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ctr Res Community Serv, Sch Psychol, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Canadian Mental Hlth Assoc, Ottawa Carleton Branch, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
implementation evaluation; process evaluation; community mental health; instrument validation;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2002.11.001
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Despite increasing interest in process evaluation and the development of a variety of approaches to assess program implementation, several methodological challenges remain. Of particular concern is the development of ways not only to adequately determine the extent to which programs are implemented as intended but the provision of effective means to use such information in explaining observed variation in program outcomes. Following a review and critique of the process evaluation literature, particularly in the domain of community mental health, the paper introduces the use of 'key component profiles' (KCP) as an alternative methodological approach to evaluating program implementation. A case application in the context of an intensive case management program for meeting the needs of clients with severe mental illness who are homeless is described. The steps in developing the multiple dimension profile of program implementation are detailed and validation data provided. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for use within the local context and, more generally, the use of KCPs for process evaluation. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF COMMUNITY CARE FOR THE CHRONICALLY MENTALLY-DISABLED - THE ROLE OF CASE MANAGEMENT
    INTAGLIATA, J
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 1982, 8 (04) : 655 - 674
  • [22] KING JA, 1987, ACCESS PROGRAM IMPLE
  • [23] Leithwood K, 1987, IMPROVING CLASSROOM
  • [24] EVALUATING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
    LEITHWOOD, KA
    MONTGOMERY, DJ
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 1980, 4 (02) : 193 - 214
  • [25] McCoy AR, 1998, ADV EDUC PR, V7, P117
  • [26] Using process data to explain outcomes - An illustration from the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health (CATCH)
    McGraw, SA
    Sellers, DE
    Stone, EJ
    Bebchuk, J
    Edmundson, EW
    Johnson, CC
    Bachman, KJ
    Luepker, RV
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 1996, 20 (03) : 291 - 312
  • [27] MEASURING THE FIDELITY OF IMPLEMENTATION OF A MENTAL-HEALTH PROGRAM MODEL
    MCGREW, JH
    BOND, GR
    DIETZEN, L
    SALYERS, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 62 (04) : 670 - 678
  • [28] Methodological issues in assertive community treatment studies
    McHugo, GJ
    Hargreaves, W
    Drake, RE
    Clark, RE
    Xie, HY
    Bond, GR
    Burns, BJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 1998, 68 (02) : 246 - 260
  • [29] More appropriate evaluation methods for community-level health interventions
    McKinlay, JB
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 1996, 20 (03) : 237 - 243
  • [30] HELPING HOMELESS MENTALLY-ILL PEOPLE - WHAT VARIABLES MEDIATE AND MODERATE PROGRAM EFFECTS
    MORSE, GA
    CALSYN, RJ
    ALLEN, G
    KENNY, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 22 (05) : 661 - 683