Factors Affecting Fuelwood Consumption and CO2 Emissions: An Example from a Community-Managed Forest of Nepal

被引:12
作者
Baral, Sony [1 ]
Basnyat, Bijendra [2 ]
Gauli, Kalyan [3 ]
Paudel, Ambika [4 ]
Upadhyaya, Rachana [5 ]
Timilsina, Yajna Prasad [2 ]
Vacik, Harald [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Silviculture, Dept Forest & Soil Sci, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[2] Inst Forestry, Pokhara 33700, Nepal
[3] Deutsch Gesell Int Zusammenarbeit GIZ, Lalitpur 44700, Nepal
[4] Carleton Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, 1125 Coloney Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[5] Southasia Inst Adv Studies, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
关键词
fuelwood; community-managed forest; energy; alternative energy; low carbon emission; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; COOKING; POVERTY; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.3390/en12234492
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Fuelwood is the primary source of energy in Nepal, where 87.1% of the total energy is derived from wood, making it the major source for carbon emissions. This study explores the factors affecting the fuelwood consumption, the amount of carbon emissions including the potential for carbon sequestration in community forests, taking a case study of Kankali Community Forest Users Group (CFUG) of Chitwan district of Nepal. Interviews with 217 households revealed that 60% of the households still depend on fuelwood for cooking, which apparently emits approximately 13.68 tons of carbon dioxide annually. The emission, however, varies with the economic status of the households; poor households rely exclusively on fuelwood for cooking and therefore emit greater amount of carbon. Similarly, the carbon emission was also found to be directly proportional to the family size and livestock holding, and inversely proportional to landholding and per capita income. A more conservation-oriented forest management along with activities to support livelihood has contributed to lower carbon emissions. Interestingly, the poverty-energy trap seemed to have a distinct gender dimension. We argue that CFUGs need to invest in income-generating activities for local users, and especially for women of low-income households, in order to reduce current carbon emission.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Socioeconomic stratification by wealth ranking: Is it valid? [J].
Adams, AM ;
Evans, TG ;
Mohammed, R ;
Farnsworth, J .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 25 (07) :1165-1172
[2]  
Alternative Energy Promotion Centre (AEPC), 2017, ALT EN ANN REP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WORLD REV FISHERIES, P1
[4]   Investments in different taxonomies of goods: What should Nepal's community forest user groups prioritize? [J].
Baral, Sony ;
Chhetri, Bir Bahadur Khanal ;
Baral, Himlal ;
Vacik, Harald .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 100 :24-32
[5]   Ecological and economical sustainability assessment of community forest management in Nepal: A reality check [J].
Baral, Sony ;
Gautam, Ambika Prasad ;
Vacik, Harald .
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY, 2018, 37 (08) :820-841
[6]   Low greenhouse gas biomass options for cooking in the developing countries [J].
Bhattacharya, SC ;
Salam, PA .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 22 (04) :305-317
[7]  
Bhattarai L.N., 2013, J ECON LIT, V11, P26, DOI [10.3126/el.v11i0.14863, DOI 10.3126/EL.V11I0.14863]
[8]  
Bhattarai T.N., 2009, P INT C REN EN TECHN
[9]  
Bowles, 2017, ESSENTIAL GUIDE CRIT, P179
[10]  
Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), 2017, NAT POP HOUS CENS NA