Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis

被引:65
作者
Odermatt, Manfred [1 ]
Ahmed, Jamil [2 ]
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis [2 ]
Khan, Jim [1 ]
Parvaiz, Amjad [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Minimally Invas Colorectal Unit, Southwick Hill Rd, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, Hants, England
[2] Poole Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Poole, Dorset, England
[3] Poole Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, European Acad Robot Colorectal Surg, Poole, Dorset, England
[4] Laparoscop & Robot Colorectal Surg Champalimaud F, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2017年 / 31卷 / 10期
关键词
Robotic surgery; Total mesorectal excision; Rectal surgery; Cumulative sum; Learning curve; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; CANCER; COMPETENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-017-5453-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The learning curve for robotic colorectal surgery is ill-defined. This study aimed to investigate the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic rectal surgeons when starting with robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) using cumulative sum (CUSUM) charts. This retrospective case series analysed patients who underwent curative and elective laparoscopic or robotic TMEs for rectal cancer performed by two surgeons. The first consecutive robotic TME cases of each surgeon were 1:1 propensity score matched to their laparoscopic TME cases using age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, T stage (AJCC) and tumour location height. The matched laparoscopic cases defined individual standards for the quality indicators: operating time, R stage, lymph node harvest, length of hospital stay and major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5). Deviation of more than a quarter of a standard deviation from the mean for the continuous indicators, or exceeding the observed risk for the binary indicators was defined as off-target with an upward inflection in the CUSUM curve. From 2006 to 2015, 384 (294 laparoscopic; 90 robotic) TMEs met the inclusion criteria. Surgeon A performed 206 (70.1%) of the laparoscopic and 43 (47.8%) of the robotic cases. Surgeon B performed 88 (29.9%) of the laparoscopic and 47 (52.2%) of the robotic cases. After matching, no covariate exhibited an absolute standardised mean difference > 0.25. For surgeon A, the CUSUM curves showed no apparent learning process compared to his laparoscopic standards. For surgeon B, a learning process for operation time, lymph node harvest and major complications was demonstrated by an initial upward inflection of the CUSUM curves; after 15 cases, all quality indicators were generally on target. For experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons, the formal learning process for robotic TME may be short to reach a similar performance level as obtained in conventional laparoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:4067 / 4076
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Three-step standardized approach for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure during robotic rectal cancer surgery [J].
Ahmed, J. ;
Kuzu, M. A. ;
Figueiredo, N. ;
Khan, J. ;
Parvaiz, A. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (05) :O171-O174
[2]   Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: Current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes [J].
Alonso Araujo, Sergio Eduardo ;
Seid, Victor Edmond ;
Klajner, Sidney .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (39) :14359-14370
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[4]   Is Lymph Node Count an Ideal Quality Indicator for Cancer Care? [J].
Baxter, Nancy N. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 99 (04) :265-268
[5]   Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes [J].
Bianchi, P. P. ;
Ceriani, C. ;
Locatelli, A. ;
Spinoglio, G. ;
Zampino, M. G. ;
Sonzogni, A. ;
Crosta, C. ;
Andreoni, B. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (11) :2888-2894
[6]   Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM [J].
Biau, David J. ;
Resche-Rigon, Mathieu ;
Godiris-Petit, Gae ;
Nizard, Remy S. ;
Porcher, Raphael .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 16 (03) :203-207
[7]   The use of the Cusum Technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures [J].
Bolsin, S ;
Colson, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 12 (05) :433-438
[8]  
Bowers J, 2010, ITOOLS RANDOMIZA TIO
[9]   CUSUM: A tool for early feedback about performance? [J].
Chang W.R. ;
McLean I.P. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6 (1)
[10]   An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer [J].
Collinson, Fiona J. ;
Jayne, David G. ;
Pigazzi, Alessio ;
Tsang, Charles ;
Barrie, Jennifer M. ;
Edlin, Richard ;
Garbett, Christopher ;
Guillou, Pierre ;
Holloway, Ivana ;
Howard, Helen ;
Marshall, Helen ;
McCabe, Christopher ;
Pavitt, Sue ;
Quirke, Phil ;
Rivers, Carly S. ;
Brown, Julia M. B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (02) :233-241