Time Course of Changes in Goblet Cell Density in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Contact Lens Wearers

被引:32
作者
Colorado, Luisa H. [1 ]
Alzahrani, Yahya [1 ]
Pritchard, Nicola [1 ]
Efron, Nathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Kelvin Grove, Australia
关键词
contact lens wear; symptoms; dry eye; conjunctival goblet cells; VIVO CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY ANALYSIS; DRY EYE QUESTIONNAIRE; AGE-RELATED-CHANGES; IN-VIVO; MEIBOMIAN GLANDS; CONJUNCTIVA; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.16-19298
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To investigate longitudinal changes in goblet cell density (GCD) in contact lens (CL) wearers who do and do not develop symptoms of dry eye (DE). METHODS. Sixty healthy individuals fitted with daily disposable hydrogel CLs and 23 age-balanced non-CL-wearing controls underwent assessment using the 5-item dry eye questionnaire, noninvasive tear film break-up time measurement, ocular surface assessment, and phenol red thread test evaluation. Laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) were used to assess GCD at baseline and follow-up visits at 1 week and 1 and 6 months. After 1 week, all CL wearers were categorized as those who were and were not symptomatic based on responses to the CL dry eye questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8). A linear mixed-model was used to examine changes in GCD over time. RESULTS. The global mean GCD of the 83 participants at baseline (before CL wear) was 476 +/- 41 and 467 +/- 52 cells/mm(2) using LSCM and CIC, respectively. After 6 months of CL wear, GCD was reduced by approximately 13% and 29% in asymptomatic (N = 29) and symptomatic (N = 17) CL wearers (all P < 0.001), respectively, observed with both LSCM and CIC. CONCLUSIONS. Contact lens wear induces a reduction of GCD over 6 months, which is exacerbated in those with DE symptoms. Either LSCM or CIC can be used to assess GCD in the conjunctiva.
引用
收藏
页码:2888 / 2894
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] A Bowling, 2002, RES METHODS HLTH, P166
  • [2] Albietz Julie M., 2001, CLAO Journal, V27, P35
  • [3] Alzahrani Y, CLIN EXP OP IN PRESS
  • [4] Use of the dry eye questionnaire to measure symptoms of ocular irritation in patients with aqueous tear deficient dry eye
    Begley, CG
    Caffery, B
    Chalmers, RL
    Mitchell, GL
    [J]. CORNEA, 2002, 21 (07) : 664 - 670
  • [5] Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey
    Begley, CG
    Caffery, B
    Nichols, KK
    Chalmers, R
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2000, 77 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [6] Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) and Opinion of Contact Lens Performance
    Chalmers, Robin L.
    Begley, Carolyn G.
    Moody, Kurt
    Hickson-Curran, Sheila B.
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2012, 89 (10) : 1435 - 1442
  • [7] Validation of the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5): Discrimination across self-assessed severity and aqueous tear deficient dry eye diagnoses
    Chalmers, Robin L.
    Begley, Carolyn G.
    Caffery, Barbara
    [J]. CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2010, 33 (02) : 55 - 60
  • [8] An in vivo confocal microscopy and impression cytology analysis of preserved and unpreserved levobunolol-induced conjunctival changes
    Ciancaglini, M.
    Carpineto, P.
    Agnifili, L.
    Nubile, M.
    Fasanella, V.
    Lanzini, M.
    Calienno, R.
    Mastropasqua, L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 18 (03) : 400 - 407
  • [9] Assessment of conjunctival goblet cell density using laser scanning confocal microscopy versus impression cytology
    Colorado, Luisa H.
    Alzahrani, Yahya
    Pritchard, Nicola
    Efron, Nathan
    [J]. CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2016, 39 (03) : 221 - 226
  • [10] Connor C G, 1994, J Am Optom Assoc, V65, P792