Assisted vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in breech presentation

被引:30
作者
Krupitz, H [1 ]
Arzt, W [1 ]
Ebner, T [1 ]
Sommergruber, M [1 ]
Steininger, E [1 ]
Tews, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Landes Frauen & Kinderklin, Abt Geburtshilfe, A-4020 Linz, Austria
关键词
breech presentation; neonatal morbidity; planned cesarean section; trial of labor; APGAR; Base excess; plexus paresis;
D O I
10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00845.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background. The Term Breech Trial (TBT), a well-known study conducted by Hannah and published in the Lancet, revealed a better outcome for neonates after primary caesarean section compared with attempted vaginal delivery. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the results of TBT have to be taken into account when counseling pregnant women in central Europe. Methods. We investigated 882 women who had delivered infants in breech presentation over a period of 11 years. The neonates had a birthweight of > 2500 g and no malformations. We compared mortality and serious neonatal morbidity after attempted vaginal delivery and after primary caesarean section. Results. No infant or maternal mortality was registered in either group. Serious neonatal morbidity was higher (0.5%; n = 2) for attempted vaginal delivery than for primary caesarean section; in the latter group, no child fulfilled the criteria for serious neonatal morbidity. However, the difference was not statistically significant. As expected, after attempted vaginal delivery, the base excess, and 5-min APGAR scores were indicative of more markedly depressed children. Conclusion. After careful exclusion of risk factors and informing the patient in detail about the risks and possible complications, vaginal delivery from breech presentation is still warrantable.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 592
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal delivery or cesarean section [J].
Albrechtsen, S ;
Rasmussen, S ;
Reigstad, H ;
Markestad, T ;
Irgens, LM ;
Dalaker, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (03) :586-592
[2]  
CHRISTIAN SS, 1990, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V163, P848
[3]   What are the implications for the next delivery in primigravidae who have an elective caesarean section for breech presentation? [J].
Coughlan, C ;
Kearney, R ;
Turner, MJ .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (06) :624-626
[4]   Singleton term breech deliveries in nulliparous and multiparous women: A 5-year experience at The University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital [J].
Diro, M ;
Puangricharern, A ;
Royer, L ;
O'Sullivan, MJ ;
Burkett, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (02) :247-250
[5]  
FEIGE A, 1998, BECKENENDLAGE, P160
[6]  
Fischer T, 1996, Z GEBURTSH NEONATOL, V200, P61
[7]  
GILBERT WM, OBSTET GYNECOL, V102, P911
[8]  
GUILIANI A, 2003, AJOG, V187, P1694
[9]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383
[10]   External cephalic version for breech presentation at term [J].
Hofmeyr, G. Justus ;
Kulier, Regina ;
West, Helen M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (04)