Prognostic factors for malignant pericardial effusion treated by pericardial drainage in solid-malignancy patients

被引:10
作者
Yonemori, Kan
Kunitoh, Hideo
Tsuta, Koji
Tamura, Tetsutaro
Arai, Yasuaki
Shimada, Yasuhiro
Fujiwara, Yasuhiro
Sasajima, Yuko
Asamura, Hisao
Tamura, Tomohide
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Med Oncol, Chuo Ku, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Cardiol, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
[3] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Diagnost Radiol, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Thorac Surg, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
[5] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Gastrointestinal Oncol, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
关键词
oncologic emergency; malignant pericardial effusion; drainage; supportive care; prognostic factor;
D O I
10.1007/s12032-007-0033-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Malignant pericardial effusion is a frequent complication of advanced incurable malignancies and requires treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors for cytology -positive malignant pericardial effusion in patients treated by pericardial drainage. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a series of consecutive patients diagnosed with cytologically positive malignant pericardial effusion who were treated by pericardial drainage at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo. Results A total of 88 patients with pericardial effusion were treated by pericardial drainage, 60 patients were diagnosed with cytological positive malignant pericardial effusion including 32 with non-small cell lung cancer, 13 with breast cancer, 8 with gastrointestinal cancer, and 7 with miscellaneous cancers. Subxiphoid pericardiostomy was performed in 50 of the patients and percutaneous tube pericardiostomy in the other 10 patients. Malignant pericardial effusion recurred in 14 patients, and pericardial drainage was performed again in 9 of them. The median overall survival time was 6.1 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 28%. A multivariate analysis revealed the following significant negative prognostic factors: performance status, development of malignant pericardial effusion during chemotherapy, mediastinal lymph node enlargement, and cytologic type. (P = 0.03, 0.02, 0.01, 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Patients with poor prognostic factors may be better to consider as indication of palliative therapy, even if oncologic emergency had been resolved rapidly by drainage.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 430
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Abraham K P, 1990, Am J Cardiovasc Pathol, V3, P195
[2]   Pericardial effusion: Subxiphoid pericardiostomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage [J].
Allen, KB ;
Faber, LP ;
Warren, WH ;
Shaar, CJ .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 67 (02) :437-440
[3]  
BUCK M, 1987, CANCER, V60, P263, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19870715)60:2<263::AID-CNCR2820600225>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-N
[5]   Prognostic factors in the surgical management of pericardial effusion in the patient with concurrent malignancy [J].
Cullinane, CA ;
Paz, IB ;
Smith, D ;
Carter, N ;
Grannis, FW .
CHEST, 2004, 125 (04) :1328-1334
[6]  
FRASER RS, 1980, CANCER, V45, P1697, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19800401)45:7<1697::AID-CNCR2820450730>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-J
[8]   Abnormal cytology predicts poor prognosis in cancer patients with pericardial effusion [J].
Gornik, HL ;
Gerhard-Herman, M ;
Beckman, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (22) :5211-5216
[9]   METASTATIC CANCER TO THE HEART - REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND REPORT OF 127 CASES [J].
HANFLING, SM .
CIRCULATION, 1960, 22 (03) :474-483
[10]   Prospective comparison of the sclerosing agents doxycycline and bleomycin for the primary management of malignant pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade [J].
Liu, G ;
Crump, M ;
Goss, PE ;
Dancey, J ;
Shepherd, FA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (12) :3141-3147