Concurrent progressive ratio schedules: Effects of reinforcer probability on breakpoint and response allocation

被引:2
作者
Jarmolowicz, David P. [1 ,2 ]
Sofis, Michael J. [1 ]
Darden, Alexandria C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Appl Behav Sci, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Problem Gambling Res & Educ Support Syst, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
Progressive ratio; Probabilistic; Choice; Unit price; Rat; CHOICE; PERFORMANCE; MAGNITUDE; REWARDS; DELAY; FOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.beproc.2016.04.012
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although progressive ratio (PR) schedules have been used to explore effects of a range of reinforcer parameters (e.g., magnitude, delay), effects of reinforcer probability remain underexplored. The present project used independently progressing concurrent PR PR schedules to examine effects of reinforcer probability on PR breakpoint (highest completed ratio prior to a session terminating 300 s pause) and response allocation. The probability of reinforcement on one lever remained at 100% across all conditions while the probability of reinforcement on the other lever was systematically manipulated (i.e., 100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, and a replication of 25%). Breakpoints systematically decreased with decreasing reinforcer probabilities while breakpoints on the control lever remained unchanged. Patterns of switching between the two levers were well described by a choice-by-choice unit price model that accounted for the hyperbolic discounting of the value of probabilistic reinforcers. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 107
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Anderson K.G, 2009, BEHAV PHARMACOL, V20, P424
[2]   A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards [J].
Green, L ;
Myerson, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2004, 130 (05) :769-792
[3]   PROGRESSIVE RATION AS A MEASURE OF REWARD STRENGTH [J].
HODOS, W .
SCIENCE, 1961, 134 (348) :943-&
[4]   EFFECTS OF INCREMENT SIZE AND REINFORCER VOLUME ON PROGRESSIVE RATIO PERFORMANCE [J].
HODOS, W ;
KALMAN, G .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1963, 6 (03) :387-&
[5]   MOTIVATIONAL PROPERTIES OF LONG DURATIONS OF REWARDING BRAIN STIMULATION [J].
HODOS, W .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1965, 59 (02) :219-&
[6]   A COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS OF DEMAND FOR FOOD [J].
HURSH, SR ;
RASLEAR, TG ;
SHURTLEFF, D ;
BAUMAN, R ;
SIMMONS, L .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1988, 50 (03) :419-440
[7]   Concurrent progressive-ratio schedules: Built-in controls in the study of delayed reward efficacy [J].
Jarmolowicz, David P. ;
Hudnall, Jennifer L. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2014, 233 :172-176
[8]   On Distinguishing Progressively Increasing Response Requirements for Reinforcement [J].
Jarmolowicz, David P. ;
Lattal, Kennon A. .
BEHAVIOR ANALYST, 2010, 33 (01) :119-125
[9]   Individual differences in impulsive and risky choice: Effects of environmental rearing conditions [J].
Kirkpatrick, Kimberly ;
Marshall, Andrew T. ;
Smith, Aaron P. ;
Koci, Juraj ;
Park, Yoonseong .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2014, 269 :115-127
[10]   Modulation of risk/reward decision making by dopaminergic transmission within the basolateral amygdala [J].
Larkin, Joshua D. ;
Jenni, Nicole L. ;
Floresco, Stan B. .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 233 (01) :121-136