General CH4 oxidation model and comparisons of CH4 oxidation in natural and managed systems

被引:0
作者
Del Grosso, SJ [1 ]
Parton, WJ
Mosier, AR
Ojima, DS
Potter, CS
Borken, W
Brumme, R
Butterbach-Bahl, K
Crill, PM
Dobbie, K
Smith, KA
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Nat Resource Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Gottingen, Inst Soil Sci & Forest Nutr, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Inst Atmospher Environm Res, D-82467 Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany
[4] Univ New Hampshire, Inst Study Earth Oceans & Space, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Ecol & Resource Management, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] USDA ARS, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[7] NASA, Ames Res Ctr, Johnson Controls World Services Inc, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fluxes of methane from field observations of native and cropped grassland soils in Colorado and Nebraska were used to model CH4 oxidation as a function of soil water content, temperature, porosity, and field capacity (FC). A beta function is used to characterize the effect of soil water on the physical limitation of gas diffusivity when water is high and biological limitation when water is low. Optimum soil volumetric water content (W-opt) increases with FC. The site specific maximum CH4 oxidation rate (CH4max) varies directly with soil gas diffusivity (D) as a function of soil bulk density and FC. Although soil water content and physical pro are the primary controls on CH4 uptake, the potential for soil temperature to affect CH4 uptake rates increases as soils become less limited by gas diffusivity. Daily CH4 oxidation rate is calculated as the product of CH4max, the normalized (0-100%) beta function to account for water effects, a temperature multiplier, and an adjustment factor to account for the effects of agriculture on methane flux. The model developed with grassland soils also worked well in coniferous and tropical forest soils. However, soil gas diffusivity as a function of field capacity, and bulk density did not reliably predict maximum CH4 oxidation rates in deciduous forest soils, so a submodel for these systems was developed assuming that CH4max is a function of mineral soil bulk density. The overall model performed well with the data used for model development (r(2) = 0.76) and with independent data from grasslands, cultivated lands, and coniferous, deciduous, and tropical forests (r(2) = 0.73, mean error < 6%).
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1019
页数:21
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   METHANE CONSUMPTION IN TEMPERATE AND SUB-ARCTIC FOREST SOILS - RATES, VERTICAL ZONATION, AND RESPONSES TO WATER AND NITROGEN [J].
ADAMSEN, APS ;
KING, GM .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 59 (02) :485-490
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Climate Change 1994
[3]   Methane oxidation in a neutral landfill cover soil: Influence of moisture content, temperature, and nitrogen-turnover [J].
Boeckx, P ;
VanCleemput, O .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1996, 25 (01) :178-183
[4]   Methane oxidation in soils with different textures and land use [J].
Boeckx, P ;
VanCleemput, O ;
Villaralvo, I .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 1997, 49 (1-3) :91-95
[5]  
BORKEN W, 1996, THESIS U GOTTINGEN G
[6]   SUPPRESSION OF METHANE OXIDATION IN AEROBIC SOIL BY NITROGEN FERTILIZERS, NITRIFICATION INHIBITORS, AND UREASE INHIBITORS [J].
BRONSON, KF ;
MOSIER, AR .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1994, 17 (04) :263-268
[7]   Site variation in methane oxidation as affected by atmospheric deposition and type of temperate forest ecosystem [J].
Brumme, R ;
Borken, W .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1999, 13 (02) :493-501
[8]   SOIL-MOISTURE AS A PREDICTOR OF METHANE UPTAKE BY TEMPERATE FOREST SOILS [J].
CASTRO, MS ;
MELILLO, JM ;
STEUDLER, PA ;
CHAPMAN, JW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1994, 24 (09) :1805-1810
[9]  
CONRAD R, 1989, LIFE SCI R, V47, P39
[10]   TEMPERATURE AND N-FERTILIZATION EFFECTS ON METHANE OXIDATION IN A DRAINED PEATLAND SOIL [J].
CRILL, PM ;
MARTIKAINEN, PJ ;
NYKANEN, H ;
SILVOLA, J .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 26 (10) :1331-1339