Piecewise linear value functions for multi-criteria decision-making

被引:42
作者
Rezaei, Jafar [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Multi-criteria decision-making; MCDM; Decision criteria; Value function; Monotonicity; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; GENERATION; OPERATORS; SELECTION; CRITERIA; UTILITY; MODEL; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.004
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) concerns selecting, ranking or sorting a set of alternatives which are evaluated with respect to a number of criteria. There are several MCDM methods, the two core elements of which are (i) evaluating the performance of the alternatives with respect to the criteria, (ii) finding the importance (weight) of the criteria. There are several methods to find the weights of the criteria, however, when it comes to the alternative measures with respect to the criteria, usually the existing MCDM methods use simple monotonic linear value functions. Usually an increasing or decreasing linear function is assumed between a criterion level (over its entire range) and its value. This assumption, however, might lead to improper results. This study proposes a family of piecewise value functions which can be used for different decision criteria for different decision problems. Several real-world examples from existing literature are provided to illustrate the applicability of the proposed value functions. A numerical example of supplier selection (including a comparison between simple monotonic linear value functions, piecewise linear value functions, and exponential value functions) shows how considering proper value functions could affect the final results of an MCDM problem. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 56
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Multi-criteria evaluation of residential energy supply systems [J].
Alanne, Kari ;
Salo, Ahti ;
Saari, Arto ;
Gustafsson, Stig-Inge .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2007, 39 (12) :1218-1226
[2]   A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning [J].
Ananda, Jayanath ;
Herath, Gamini .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (10) :2535-2548
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, LEARNING INNOVATION, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199241002.001.0001/ACPROF-9780199241002
[4]   A participatory multi-criteria approach for power generation and transmission planning [J].
Bertsch, Valentin ;
Fichtner, Wolf .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 245 (1-2) :177-207
[5]   Sensitivity analyses in multi-attribute decision support for off-site nuclear emergency and recovery management [J].
Bertsch, Valentin ;
Treitz, Martin ;
Geldermann, Jutta ;
Rentz, Otto .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2007, 1 (04) :342-365
[6]  
Brans J. P., 1984, Operational Reseach '84. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, P477
[7]  
Brugha Cathal., 1998, Trends in Multicriteria Decision Making: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, V465, P229, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-45772-2_1, 10.1007/978-3-642-45772-2_19, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-45772-2_19]
[8]   Relative measurement and the power function [J].
Brugha, CM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2000, 121 (03) :627-640
[9]   A two-stage fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and order allocation problem with quantity discounts and lead time [J].
Cebi, Ferhan ;
Otay, Irem .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 339 :143-157
[10]   Developing key performance indicators for supply chain: an industry perspective [J].
Chae, Bongsug .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2009, 14 (06) :422-428