Soybean sowing date: The vegetative, reproductive, and agronomic impacts

被引:137
作者
Bastidas, A. M. [1 ]
Setryono, T. D. [1 ]
Dobermann, A. [1 ]
Cassman, K. G. [1 ]
Elmore, R. W. [2 ]
Graef, G. L. [1 ]
Specht, J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2006.05.0292
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The sensitivity of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] main stem node accrual to ambient temperature has been documented in greenhouse-grown plants but not with field-grown plants in the north-central United States. Biweekly V-node and R-stage, stem node number, internode length, and other traits were quantified in an irrigated split-plot, four-replicate, randomized complete block experiment conducted in Lincoln, NE, in 2003-2004. Main plots were early-, mid-, late-May, and mid-June sowing dates. Subplots were 14 cultivars of maturity groups 3.0 to 3.9. Node appearance was surprisingly linear from V1 to R5, despite the large increase in daily temperature from early May (10-15 degrees C) to July (20-25 degrees C). The 2003 and 2004 May planting date regressions exhibited near-identical slopes of 0.27 node d(-1) (i.e., one node every 3.7 d). Cold-induced delays in germination and emergence did delay the V1 date (relative to planting date), so the primary effect of temperature was the V1 start date of linearity in node appearance. With one exception, earlier sowings led to more nodes (earlier V1 start dates) but also resulted in shorter internodes at nodes 3 to 9 (cooler coincident temperature), thereby generating a curved response of plant height to delayed planting. Delaying planting after 1 May let to significant linear seed yield declines of 17 kg ha(-1) d(-1) in 2003 and 43 kg ha(-1) d(-1) in 2004, denoting the importance of early planting for capturing the yield potential available in soybean production, when moisture supply is not limiting.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 740
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]   EFFECTS OF PLANTING DATE ON 2 SOYBEAN CULTIVARS - SEASONAL DRY-MATTER ACCUMULATION AND SEED YIELD [J].
ANDERSON, LR ;
VASILAS, BL .
CROP SCIENCE, 1985, 25 (06) :999-1004
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SOYBEANS IMPROVEMENT
[4]   RESPONSE OF DETERMINATE AND INDETERMINATE SOYBEANS TO VARYING CULTURAL-PRACTICES IN THE NORTHERN USA [J].
BEAVER, JS ;
JOHNSON, RR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1981, 73 (05) :833-838
[5]  
BEUERLEIN J E, 1988, Journal of Production Agriculture, V1, P300
[6]   Genetic coefficients in the CROPGRO-Soybean model: Links to field performance and genomics [J].
Boote, KJ ;
Jones, JW ;
Batchelor, WD ;
Nafziger, ED ;
Myers, O .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (01) :32-51
[7]   A delayed flowering barrier to higher soybean yields [J].
Cooper, RL .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2003, 82 (01) :27-35
[8]   PARTITIONING OF ASSIMILATE BETWEEN VEGETATIVE AND REPRODUCTIVE GROWTH IN SOYBEAN [J].
EGLI, DB ;
GUFFY, RD ;
LEGGETT, JE .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1985, 77 (06) :917-922
[9]   SOYBEAN CULTIVAR RESPONSE TO TILLAGE SYSTEMS AND PLANTING DATE [J].
ELMORE, RW .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1990, 82 (01) :69-73
[10]   THE PLASTOCHRON INDEX [J].
ERICKSON, RO ;
MICHELINI, FJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1957, 44 (04) :297-305