Facilitating creativity in interdisciplinary design teams using cognitive processes: A review

被引:19
作者
Reiter-Palmon, Roni [1 ]
Leone, Salvatore [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Coll Arts & Sci, 6001 Dodge St, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
关键词
Review; interaction; teams; creativity; innovation; interdisciplinary teams; engineering; design; creative problem solving; IDEA GENERATION; BRAINSTORMING GROUPS; PROBLEM CONSTRUCTION; PRODUCTIVITY LOSS; INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; DIVERSITY; CONFLICT; CHALLENGES; PREFERENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0954406217753236
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Interdisciplinary, or cross-functional, teams have become quite common for engineering and design. Many of today's scientific breakthroughs occur in interdisciplinary teams, as the increasingly complex problems facing society often cannot be addressed by single disciplines alone. However, fostering creative and productive collaboration in interdisciplinary teams is no easy challenge. First, leading creative teamwork is difficult by itself. Second, many of the factors that impede teams and teamwork in general are exacerbated in interdisciplinary teams as a result of differences between team members. In this paper, we will review the team creativity psychology and management literature, and discuss how cognitive processes that facilitate creativity can be used by engineering and design teams. Specifically, past research has shown problem construction that allows teams to develop a structure to guide solving ambiguous problems. Further, problem construction allows teams to develop a shared understanding of the problem which aids in later processes. While there is significant research on idea generation, results suggest that teams may not be better at this than individuals. In this review, we discuss how idea generation in teams can mitigate some of the issues that lead to this effect. Finally, team research has only recently began to determine what factors influence idea evaluation and selection for implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 394
页数:10
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Alves J., 2007, Creativity Innovation Management, V16, P27, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8691.2007.00417.X
[2]  
ANCONA DG, 1992, TRANSFORMING ORGANIZATIONS, P154
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, DESIGN COMPUTING COG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Creativity Research Journal, DOI [10.1080/10400419109534380, DOI 10.1080/10400419109534380]
[5]  
[Anonymous], ROEPER REV
[6]   The Effect of Problem Construction Creativity on Solution Creativity Across Multiple Everyday Problems [J].
Arreola, Nicholas J. ;
Reiter-Palmon, Roni .
PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2016, 10 (03) :287-295
[7]   Nominal group technique, social loafing, and group creative project quality [J].
Asmus, CL ;
James, K .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2005, 17 (04) :349-354
[8]   Small group brainstorming and idea quality - Is electronic brainstorming the most effective approach? [J].
Barki, H ;
Pinsonneault, A .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2001, 32 (02) :158-205
[9]   Effects of training on idea generation in groups [J].
Baruah, Jonali ;
Paulus, Paul B. .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2008, 39 (05) :523-541
[10]   TRAINING IN CREATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING - EFFECTS ON IDEATION AND PROBLEM FINDING AND SOLVING IN AN INDUSTRIAL-RESEARCH ORGANIZATION [J].
BASADUR, M ;
GRAEN, GB ;
GREEN, SG .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1982, 30 (01) :41-70