EU-ASEAN relations in the 2020s: pragmatic inter-regionalism?

被引:10
作者
Gilson, Julie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
INTERNATIONAL-RELATIONS; INTERDEPENDENCE; POLITICS; POLICY; JAPAN;
D O I
10.1007/s10368-020-00474-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The world in the late 1990s and early 2000s witnessed a proliferation of region-to-region institutional frameworks. There was a recognition that scale and leverage could create an advantage for economic relations, that security could benefit from cross-region dialogue and initiatives, and that some of the many global challenges, from global climate change to resource depletion, could be addressed more effectively at regional and even inter-regional levels. The EU-ASEAN dialogue itself presents an important model for inter-regional cooperation at the heart of these tangled institutional webs. This article assesses the ways in which the changing multilateral landscape and intra-regional crises within ASEAN and the EU have altered the relevance of inter-regional dialogue and initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 745
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism [J].
Acharya, A .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2004, 58 (02) :239-275
[2]  
Acharya A., 2015, J ASIAN AFF, V2, P3
[3]  
Aggarwal Vinod., 2004, EU TRADE STRATEGIES
[4]  
Aggarwal VK, 1998, RECONCILING MULTIPLE, p1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, GLOBALISM NEW REGION
[6]  
[Anonymous], WASHINGTON Q
[7]   Getting It Right: Japan and Trans-Pacific Partnership [J].
Auslin, Michael .
ASIA-PACIFIC REVIEW, 2012, 19 (01) :21-36
[8]  
Beeson M, 2019, HBK RES INT POLIT EC, P345
[9]  
Breslin Shaun., 2002, New regionalism in the global political economy
[10]   Preferential trade agreements as instruments of foreign policy: an Australia-Japan free trade agreement and its implications for the Asia Pacific region [J].
Capling, Ann .
PACIFIC REVIEW, 2008, 21 (01) :27-43