Comparing the Technology Trajectories of Solar PV and Solar Water Heaters in China: Using a Patent Lens

被引:16
作者
Wang, Yawei [1 ]
Urban, Frauke [2 ]
Zhou, Yuan [1 ]
Chen, Luyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; solar water heater; solar photovoltaic; technology trajectories; patent network; GREEN-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES; SECTORAL PATTERNS; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; INDUSTRY; DIFFUSION; CELLS; FIRMS; COLLABORATION; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.3390/su10114166
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China invests more in renewable energy than any other countries, such as in solar energy. The traditional literature maintains that these government-supported industries are more innovative than grassroots industries such as solar or thermal, which leads to debate. This study uses mixed methods, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to compare the technology trajectories of leading solar water heater (SWH) and solar photovoltaic (PV) firms in China. It concentrates on the following three aspects: trajectories of key technologies, patent citation network, and type of collaboration. Our analyses show that technology trajectories differ significantly between leading SWH firms and PV firms in China. We find that the Chinese SWH firms are core to international knowledge networks, and are following a market-driven innovation mode. In contrast, Chinese PV firms are close to the center of the network and government-driven. Research suggests that grassroots innovation, by doing, using, and interaction (DUI), can create short-term market development models relying on China's traditional industry model, but cannot create a long-term international leading innovation model; only integrated science, technology, innovation modes (STI), and DUI innovation modes tend to result in international leadership in innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Interorganizational collaboration and firm innovativeness: Unpacking the role of the organizational environment [J].
Alexiev, Alexander S. ;
Volberda, Henk W. ;
Van den Bosch, Frans A. J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (02) :974-984
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, RENEW ENERGY RESOUR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU10041129
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1912, THEORY EC DEV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI [DOI 10.3390/su10061883, DOI 10.3390/SU10061883]
[6]   How Europes economies learn:: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15 [J].
Arundel, Anthony ;
Lorenz, Edward ;
Lundvall, Bengt-Ake ;
Valeyre, Antoine .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2007, 16 (06) :1175-1210
[7]  
Braun T., 2005, KEEPING GATES SCI J, V63, P95
[8]   Patents as proxy for measuring innovations: A case of changing patent filing behavior in Indian public funded research organizations [J].
Burhan, Muqbil ;
Singh, Anil K. ;
Jain, Sudhir K. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 123 :181-190
[9]   China's 15 year science and technology plan [J].
Cao, Cong ;
Suttmeier, Richard P. ;
Simon, Denis Fred .
PHYSICS TODAY, 2006, 59 (12) :38-43
[10]   Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation [J].
Castellacci, Fulvio .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (6-7) :978-994