Outcomes of endovascular treatment of superficial femoral artery in-stent stenosis and/or occlusion

被引:0
作者
Abdelmoneim, Maher [1 ]
Khairy, Hussien M. [1 ]
Ghanem, Ahmed A. H. [1 ]
Rahim, Amr A. [1 ]
Khalefa, Samy [1 ]
Shaker, Ahmed A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Cairo 11562, Egypt
关键词
stenosis; stent; superficial femoral artery; DRUG-COATED BALLOON; REDUCE RESTENOSIS; ELUTING BALLOON; FEMOROPOPLITEAL; PACLITAXEL; CLASSIFICATION; ANGIOPLASTY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.4103/ejs.ejs_115_21
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction In-spite the development of novel therapies for femoropopliteal disease treatment, nitinol stents remain the mainstay of therapy following balloon angioplasty popliteal artery (POPA). femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis remains an important clinical dilemma. Materials and methods A randomized controlled study, including 40 patients undergoing elective endovascular treatment for superficial femoral artery in stent restenosis (SFA ISR), was conducted to clarify the technical feasibility and the outcomes of the endovascular intervention. Results In total, 55% of cases were females (n=22), 70% were diabetics (n=28), 32.5% had a history of tobacco abuse (n=13), 57.5% were hypertensive (n=23), and 27.5% with past history of open revascularization (n=11). Median age and per-procedural ankle brachial indices was 62 and 0.4, respectively. Procedural and clinical success was achieved in 32 limbs (80%). Failure of engagement occurred in eight patients with total occlusion of the stent (class III). The results for POPA alone versus combined drug-coated balloons and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in relation to primary and secondary outcomes in successful cases at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up were usage of combined drug-coated balloons and POBA associated with increasing percentage of targeted outcomes (21.9, 30.4, and 54.5%, respectively) with significant P value. Deployment of bare-metal nitinol stent was associated with improvement in primary and secondary outcomes at 3 and 6 months of follow-up (59.4 and 65.2%, respectively), but the percentage reduced at 12 months of follow-up into 54.5% (significant P values 0.004, 0.009, and <0.001, respectively). Conclusion Endovascular treatment of in-stent occlusion is associated with high success rates and higher primary and secondary patency rates.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 871
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Interleukins and Inflammatory Markers in In-Stent Restenosis after Femoral Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty [J].
Araujo, Paula Vasconcelos ;
Ribeiro, Mauricio Serra ;
Dalio, Marcelo Bellini ;
Rocha, Laura Andrade ;
Viaro, Fernanda ;
Joviliano, Renata Dellalibera ;
Piccinato, Carlos Eli ;
Barbosa Evora, Paulo Roberto ;
Joviliano, Edwaldo Edner .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 29 (04) :731-737
[2]   Tissue Uptake, Distribution, and Healing Response After Delivery of Paclitaxel via Second-Generation Iopromide-Based Balloon Coating A Comparison With the First-Generation Technology in the Iliofemoral Porcine Model [J].
Buszman, Piotr P. ;
Tellez, Armando ;
Afari, Maxwell E. ;
Peppas, Athanasios ;
Conditt, Gerard B. ;
Rousselle, Serge D. ;
McGregor, Jennifer C. ;
Stenoien, Mark ;
Kaluza, Greg L. ;
Granada, Juan F. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (08) :883-890
[3]   Systematic review and updated meta-analysis of the use of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus plain old balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial disease [J].
Caradu, Caroline ;
Lakhlifi, Emilie ;
Colacchio, Elda Chiara ;
Midy, Dominique ;
Berard, Xavier ;
Poirier, Mathieu ;
Ducasse, Eric .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (03) :981-+
[4]   A randomized phase II study of Xilonix, a targeted therapy against interleukin 1α, for the prevention of superficial femoral artery restenosis after percutaneous revascularization [J].
El Sayed, Hosam ;
Kerensky, Richard ;
Stecher, Michael ;
Mohanty, Prasant ;
Davies, Mark .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 63 (01) :133-U200
[5]   Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs Standard Angioplasty to Reduce Restenosis in Diabetic Patients With In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: Three-Year Results of the DEBATE-ISR Study [J].
Grotti, Simone ;
Liistro, Francesco ;
Angioli, Paolo ;
Ducci, Kenneth ;
Falsini, Giovanni ;
Porto, Italo ;
Ricci, Lucia ;
Ventoruzzo, Giorgio ;
Turini, Filippo ;
Bellandi, Guido ;
Bolognese, Leonardo .
JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2016, 23 (01) :52-57
[6]   Diagnosis, classification, and treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis [J].
Ho, Karen J. ;
Owens, Christopher D. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (02) :545-557
[7]   Acotec Drug-Coated Balloon Catheter Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Clinical Study in Femoropopliteal Arteries: Evidence From the AcoArt I Trial [J].
Jia, Xin ;
Zhang, Jiwei ;
Zhuang, Baixi ;
Fu, Weiguo ;
Wu, Danming ;
Wang, Feng ;
Zhao, Yu ;
Guo, Pingfan ;
Bi, Wei ;
Wang, Shenming ;
Guo, Wei .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (18) :1941-1949
[8]   Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Standard Balloon for Superficial Femoral Artery In-Stent Restenosis The Randomized Femoral Artery In-Stent Restenosis (FAIR) Trial [J].
Krankenberg, Hans ;
Tuebler, Thilo ;
Ingwersen, Maja ;
Schlueter, Michael ;
Scheinert, Dierk ;
Blessing, Erwin ;
Sixt, Sebastian ;
Kieback, Arne ;
Beschorner, Ulrich ;
Zeller, Thomas .
CIRCULATION, 2015, 132 (23) :2230-2236
[9]   Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for Complex Femoropopliteal Arterial Lesions The DRASTICO Study [J].
Liistro, Francesco ;
Angioli, Paolo ;
Porto, Italo ;
Ducci, Kenneth ;
Falsini, Giovanni ;
Ventoruzzo, Giorgio ;
Ricci, Lucia ;
Scatena, Alessia ;
Grotti, Simone ;
Bolognese, Leonardo .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (02) :205-215
[10]   Drug-Coated Balloons for Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions 2-Year Results of a Real-World Registry [J].
Schmidt, Andrej ;
Piorkowski, Michael ;
Goerner, Henrik ;
Steiner, Sabine ;
Bausback, Yvonne ;
Scheinert, Susanne ;
Banning-Eichenseer, Ursula ;
Staab, Holger ;
Branzan, Daniela ;
Varcoe, Ramon L. ;
Scheinert, Dierk .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (07) :715-724