Anorectal function evaluation and predictive factors for faecal incontinence in 600 patients

被引:25
作者
Lam, T. J. [1 ]
Kuik, D. J. [2 ]
Felt-Bersma, R. J. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Faecal incontinence; anorectal manometry; anal endosonography; anal sphincter function; anorectal physiology; external anal sphincter; internal anal sphincter; defunctioning stoma; temporary stoma; ANAL-SPHINCTER; ENDOANAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; RECTAL COMPLIANCE; TEMPORARY STOMA; MANOMETRY; PREVALENCE; CONTINENCE; ANASTOMOSIS; BIOFEEDBACK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02548.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Anorectal function was assessed in patients with and without faecal incontinence (FI) . Risk factors predictive for FI were determined. Method Between 2003 and 2009, all consecutive patients referred were assessed by questionnaire, anorectal manometry and anal endosonography. Predictive factors were identified and used to develop a statistical model to predict FI. Results Of 600 patients (519 women), 285 (48%) were faecally incontinent. In comparison with continent women, incontinent women (mean Vaizey score 15.4), were older, had more liquid stools, more deliveries, more urinary incontinence, lower anal pressures, shorter sphincter length, smaller rectal capacity and more sphincter defects. Incontinent men (mean Vaizey score 15.3) were older and had lower anal pressures. Incontinent and continent patients showed an overlap in test results. Predictors in women were age, stool consistency, anal pressures, rectal capacity, and internal and external sphincter defects. The area under the ROC-curve was 0.84 (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.87). Using a cut off point of 0.4, FI was predicted with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 86%, 68%, 74% and 82%, respectively. The model was studied in five women with a temporary stoma and was accurate in predicting FI after stoma closure. Conclusion Incontinent patients have lower pressures, smaller rectal capacity and more sphincter defects than controls, but show a large overlap. Our model shows a relatively high sensitivity and negative predictive value for predicting FI in women. The model seems promising in the patients studied with a temporary stoma.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 223
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   MRI defaecography in patients with faecal incontinence [J].
Melchior, C. ;
Bridoux, V. ;
Touchais, O. ;
Savoye-Collet, C. ;
Leroi, A. -M. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (03) :O62-O69
[22]   Efficacy of anorectal biofeedback in scleroderma patients with fecal incontinence: a case-control study [J].
Collins, Josephine ;
Mazor, Yoav ;
Jones, Michael ;
Kellow, John ;
Malcolm, Allison .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 51 (12) :1433-1438
[23]   CHANGES IN ANORECTAL FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH SOILING VS FECAL INCONTINENCE [J].
Montes de Oca Salinas, Flor de Maria ;
Martinez Cortes, Juana Donaji ;
Suarez Jaquez, Mariel Alexandra ;
Salas Lozano, Nereo G. ;
Moran, Edgardo Suarez ;
Zamorano-Orozco, Yolanda ;
Minero Alfaro, Jose I. ;
Blanco Vela, Claudia I. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (06) :S387-S387
[24]   Manometric evaluation of anorectal function in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J].
De Nardi, Paola ;
Testoni, Sabrina Gloria Giulia ;
Corsetti, Maura ;
Andreoletti, Hulda ;
Giollo, Patrizia ;
Passaretti, Sandro ;
Testoni, Pier Alberto .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 (01) :91-97
[25]   Evaluation of sexual dysfunction in female patients presenting with faecal incontinence or defecation disorder [J].
Pellino, Gianluca ;
Ramage, Lisa ;
Simillis, Constantinos ;
Warren, Oliver ;
Kontovounisios, Christos ;
Tan, Emile ;
Tekkis, Paris .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (05) :667-674
[26]   Prevalence of double incontinence in patients with fecal incontinence undergoing anorectal manometry and discriminating factors [J].
Surmont, M. ;
Kindt, S. .
ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 2022, 85 (02) :277-281
[27]   Self-efficacy beliefs, faecal incontinence and health-related quality of life in patients born with anorectal malformations [J].
Grano, C. ;
Fernandes, M. ;
Bucci, S. ;
Aminoff, D. ;
Lucidi, F. ;
Violani, C. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 (08) :711-718
[28]   Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: results of trial stimulation in 200 patients [J].
Gallas, S. ;
Michot, F. ;
Faucheron, J. L. ;
Meurette, G. ;
Lehur, P. A. ;
Barth, X. ;
Damon, H. ;
Mion, F. ;
Rullier, E. ;
Zerbib, F. ;
Sielezneff, I. ;
Ouaiss, M. ;
Orsoni, P. ;
Desfourneaux, V. ;
Siproudhis, L. ;
Mathonnet, M. ;
Menard, J. F. ;
Leroi, A. M. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (06) :689-696
[29]   Accuracy of Anorectal Manometry in Patients with Fecal Incontinence [J].
Pehl, C. ;
Seidl, H. ;
Scalercio, N. ;
Gundling, F. ;
Schmidt, T. ;
Schepp, W. ;
Labermeyer, S. .
DIGESTION, 2012, 86 (02) :78-85
[30]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of anal motor and rectal sensory dysfunction in male and female patients undergoing anorectal manometry for symptoms of faecal incontinence [J].
Rasijeff, Annika M. P. ;
Garcia-Zermeno, Karla ;
Di Tanna, Gian-Luca ;
Remes-Troche, Jose ;
Knowles, Charles H. ;
Scott, Mark S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 24 (05) :562-576