Quantum control and the challenge of non-Hermitian model-building

In a way inspired by the brief 2002 note "The challenge of nonhermitian structures in physics" by Ramirez and Mielnik (with the text most easily available via arXiv:quantph/0211048) the situation in the theory is briefly summarized here as it looks twelve years later. Our text has three parts. In the first one we briefly mention the pre-history (dating back to the Freeman Dyson's proposal of the non-Hermitian-Hamiltonian method in 1956 and to its subsequent successful "interacting boson model" applications in nuclear physics) and, first of all, the amazing recent progress reached, in the stationary case, using, in essence, an inversion of the Dyson's approach. The impact on the latter idea upon abstract quantum physics is sampled, first of all, by the reference to papers by Bender et al. (who made the non-Hermitian model-building popular under the nickname of parity-times-time-reflection-symmetric alias PT-symmetric quantum mechanics) and by Mostafazadeh (who reinterpreted PT-symmetry as P-pseudo-Hermiticity). In the second part of our review the emphasis is shifted to the newest, non-stationary upgrade of the formalism which we proposed in the year 2009 and which is characterized by the simultaneous participation of a triplet of Hilbert spaces H in the representation of a single quantum system. In the third part of the review we finally emphasize that the majority of applications of our three-Hilbert-space (THS) recipe is still ahead of us because the enhancement of the flexibility is necessarily accompanied by an enhancement of the technical difficulties. An escape out of the technical trap is proposed to be sought in a restriction of attention to quantum models living in finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces H. As long as the use of such spaces is so typical for the quantum-control considerations, we conclude with conjecture that the THS formalism should start searching for implementations in the field of quantum control.