Outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty with pre-existing spinal fusion surgery A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE

被引:13
作者
Wyatt, M. C. [1 ,2 ]
Kunutsor, S. K. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Beswick, A. D. [1 ]
Whitehouse, M. R. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Kieser, D. C. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Midcent Dist Hlth Board, Orthopaed Dept, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[3] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Inst Hlth Res Bristol Biomed Res Ctr, Trauma & Orthopaed, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Musculoskeletal Res Unit, Translat Hlth Sci,Southmead Hosp, Bristol, Avon, England
[6] Univ Otago, Canterbury Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Musculoskeletal Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
PELVIC INCLINATION; SAFE ZONE; DISLOCATION; REPLACEMENT; RISK; ORIENTATION; REVISION;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1473.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims There is inconsistent evidence on whether prior spinal fusion surgery adversely impacts outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between pre-existing spinal fusion surgery and the rate of complications following primary THA. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to October 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing outcomes of dislocation, revision, or reasons for revision in patients following primary THA with or without pre-existing spinal fusion surgery. Furthermore, we compared short (two or less levels) or long (three or more levels) spinal fusions to no fusion. Summary measures of association were relative risks (RRs) (with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)). Results We identified ten articles corresponding to nine unique observational studies comprising of 1,992,366 primary THAs. No RCTs were identified. There were 32,945 cases of spinal fusion and 1,752,362 non-cases. Comparing prior spinal fusion versus no spinal fusion in primary THA, RRs (95% CI) for dislocation was 2.23 (1.81 to 2.74; seven studies), revision 2.14 (1.63 to 2.83; five studies), periprosthetic joint infection 1.71 (1.53 to 1.92; four studies), periprosthetic fracture 1.52 (1.28 to 1.81; three studies), aseptic loosening 1.76 (1.54 to 2.01; three studies), and any complications 2.82 (1.37 to 5.80; three studies) were identified. Both short and long spinal fusions, when compared with no fusion, were associated dislocation, revision, or reasons for revision. Conclusions Patients with prior spinal fusion are at risk of adverse events following primary THA. Measures that reduce the risk of these complications should be considered in this high-risk population when undergoing primary THA. These patients should also be counselled appropriately around their risks of undergoing THA.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 670
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, J ARTHROPLASTY, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ARTH.2017.03.031
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BONE JOINT J, DOI DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0657.R1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, J BONE JOINT SURG B, DOI DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.92B8.24194
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BONE JOINT J B, DOI DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0577
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, INT ORTHOP, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00264-014-2491-Y
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, JAMA J AM MED ASSOC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EUR SPINE J, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00586-015-4217-2
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, J ARTHROPLASTY, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ARTH.2016.07.019
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, DOI DOI 10.2106/JBJS.17.00403
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J ARTHROPLASTY, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ARTH.2017.12.034