Decompression Alone Compared to Decompression With Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

被引:8
|
作者
Pranata, Raymond [1 ]
Lim, Michael Anthonius [1 ]
Vania, Rachel [1 ]
Mahadewa, Tjokorda Gde Bagus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pelita Harapan, Fac Med, Tangerang, Indonesia
[2] Udayana Univ, Div Neurosurg, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
decompression; spinal fusion; spondylolisthesis; lumbar vertebra; SPINAL STENOSIS; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERBODY FUSION; PLUS FUSION; SURGERY; LAMINECTOMY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.14444/8179
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We aimed to synthesize the latest evidence on the efficacy and safety of decompression alone compared to decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. We also aimed to evaluate factors affecting the efficacy and complications. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Europe PMC, Cochrane Central Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The main outcome was improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The secondary outcome was back pain and leg pain improvement, complications, reoperation rate, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and blood loss. Results: There were 3993 patients from 13 studies. Decompression with fusion was associated with greater reduction in ODI (mean difference 4.04 [95% CI 0.95, 7.13], P = 0.01) compared to decompression alone. Greater reduction in back (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.27 [95% CI 0.00, 0.53], P = 0.05) and leg pain (SMD 0.13 [95% CI 0.06, 0.21], P < 0.001) was observed in the decompression with fusion group. Complications were similar in the 2 groups (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.34, 1.04], P = 0.07). The reoperation rate was similar in both groups (P = 0.54). Decompression alone resulted in shorter duration of surgery (mean difference -85.18 minutes [95% CI -122.79, -47.57], P < 0.001), less blood loss (mean difference -262.65 mL [95% CI -313.45, -211.85], P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (mean difference -2.64 days [95% CI -3.58, -1.70], P < 0.001). Empirical Bayes random-effects meta-regression showed that the rate of complication was influenced by age (coefficient 0.172, P = 0.004). Conclusion: Decompression with fusion had greater efficacy than decompression alone but was associated with more blood loss, lengthier surgery, and hospitalization. In terms of complications, decompression alone may be beneficial in younger patients. (PROSPERO CRD42020211904)
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 80
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Perez-Roman, Roberto J.
    Gaztanaga, Wendy
    Lu, Victor M.
    Wang, Michael Y.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 36 (04) : 549 - 557
  • [32] Posterolateral Fusion Versus Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Campbell, Ryan C.
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    Lu, Victor M.
    Xu, Joshua
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    Phan, Kevin
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 (05) : 482 - 490
  • [33] Decompression Alone vs Decompression and Fusion: Spin in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
    Taka, Taha M.
    Avetisian, Henry
    El-Farra, Mohamed H.
    Gulbransen, Matthew
    Danisa, Olumide
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of interspinous process device compared with alone decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Changjiu
    Xiao, Guiling
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (23)
  • [35] Clinical effectiveness of reduction and fusion versus in situ fusion in the management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Dongfan
    Wang, Wei
    Han, Di
    Muthu, Sathish
    Cabrera, Juan P.
    Hamouda, Waeel
    Ambrosio, Luca
    Cheung, Jason P. Y.
    Le, Hai V.
    Vadala, Gianluca
    Buser, Zorica
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Cho, Samuel
    Yoon, S. Tim
    Lu, Shibao
    Chen, Xiaolong
    Diwan, Ashish D.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (05) : 1748 - 1761
  • [36] Outcomes of posterior cervical fusion and decompression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Youssef, Jim A.
    Heiner, Anneliese D.
    Montgomery, Jana R.
    Tender, Gabriel C.
    Lorio, Morgan P.
    Morreale, Joseph M.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (10): : 1714 - 1729
  • [37] Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Fusion or Decompression Alone Results in Similar Rates of Reoperation at 5 Years
    Vorhies, John S.
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Alamin, Todd
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (01): : E74 - E79
  • [38] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Kunder, Suzanne L.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Rijkers, Kim
    Caelers, Inge J. M. H.
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    de Bie, Rob A.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (11): : 1712 - 1721
  • [39] Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Levin, Jay M.
    Tanenbaum, Joseph E.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Overley, Samuel C.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (06): : 1088 - 1098
  • [40] Comparative Analysis of Decompression Versus Decompression and Fusion for Surgical Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Pieters, Thomas A.
    Li, Yan Icy
    Towner, James E.
    Schmidt, Tyler
    Vates, G. Edward
    Pilcher, Webster
    Li, Yan Michael
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 125 : E1183 - E1188