Decompression Alone Compared to Decompression With Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

被引:8
|
作者
Pranata, Raymond [1 ]
Lim, Michael Anthonius [1 ]
Vania, Rachel [1 ]
Mahadewa, Tjokorda Gde Bagus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pelita Harapan, Fac Med, Tangerang, Indonesia
[2] Udayana Univ, Div Neurosurg, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
decompression; spinal fusion; spondylolisthesis; lumbar vertebra; SPINAL STENOSIS; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERBODY FUSION; PLUS FUSION; SURGERY; LAMINECTOMY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.14444/8179
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We aimed to synthesize the latest evidence on the efficacy and safety of decompression alone compared to decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. We also aimed to evaluate factors affecting the efficacy and complications. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Europe PMC, Cochrane Central Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The main outcome was improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The secondary outcome was back pain and leg pain improvement, complications, reoperation rate, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and blood loss. Results: There were 3993 patients from 13 studies. Decompression with fusion was associated with greater reduction in ODI (mean difference 4.04 [95% CI 0.95, 7.13], P = 0.01) compared to decompression alone. Greater reduction in back (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.27 [95% CI 0.00, 0.53], P = 0.05) and leg pain (SMD 0.13 [95% CI 0.06, 0.21], P < 0.001) was observed in the decompression with fusion group. Complications were similar in the 2 groups (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.34, 1.04], P = 0.07). The reoperation rate was similar in both groups (P = 0.54). Decompression alone resulted in shorter duration of surgery (mean difference -85.18 minutes [95% CI -122.79, -47.57], P < 0.001), less blood loss (mean difference -262.65 mL [95% CI -313.45, -211.85], P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (mean difference -2.64 days [95% CI -3.58, -1.70], P < 0.001). Empirical Bayes random-effects meta-regression showed that the rate of complication was influenced by age (coefficient 0.172, P = 0.004). Conclusion: Decompression with fusion had greater efficacy than decompression alone but was associated with more blood loss, lengthier surgery, and hospitalization. In terms of complications, decompression alone may be beneficial in younger patients. (PROSPERO CRD42020211904)
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 80
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of Decompression with or without Fusion on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Caused by Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Guo, Jie
    Fan, Yonggang
    Diao, Han
    Fan, Jigeng
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Li, Jianwei
    Xiao, Donglun
    Su, Runbang
    Zhang, Ying
    Sun, Tianwei
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 194
  • [22] Decompression Versus Fusion for Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-Analysis
    Koenig, Scott
    Jauregui, Julio J.
    Shasti, Mark
    Jazini, Ehsan
    Koh, Eugene Y.
    Banagan, Kelley E.
    Gelb, Daniel E.
    Ludwig, Steven C.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [23] Decompression with fusion in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis
    Xu, Zhengfeng
    Yang, Yang
    Zhou, Xiaoxiao
    Mao, Yuanqing
    Zhao, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (10): : 10679 - +
  • [24] Decompression with fusion is not in superiority to decompression alone in lumbar stenosis based on randomized controlled trials A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
    Xu, Shuai
    Wang, Jinyu
    Liang, Yan
    Zhu, Zhenqi
    Wang, Kaifeng
    Qian, Yalong
    Liu, Haiying
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (46) : e17849
  • [25] Single and multilevel decompression alone in patients with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gomes, Fernando Cotrim
    Larcipretti, Anna Laura Lima
    Udoma-Udofa, Ofonime Chantal
    da Mata, Paulo Barrouin
    Bannach, Matheus de Andrade
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2025, 48 (01)
  • [26] Decompression with or without concomitant fusion in lumbar stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review
    Dijkerman, M. L.
    Overdevest, G. M.
    Moojen, W. A.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, C. L. A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (07) : 1629 - 1643
  • [27] Decompression Alone in the Setting of Adult Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Echt, Murray
    Ramos, Rafael De la Garza
    Geng, Eric
    Isleem, Ula
    Schwarz, Julia
    Girdler, Steven
    Platt, Andrew
    Bakare, Adewale A.
    Fessler, Richard G.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (03) : 861 - 872
  • [28] Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression
    Scholler, Karsten
    Alimi, Marjan
    Cong, Guang-Ting
    Christos, Paul
    Hartl, Roger
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (03) : 355 - 367
  • [29] Biportal endoscopic decompression vs. microscopic decompression for lumbar canal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Tiewu
    Zhou, Guoqing
    Chen, Zhineng
    Yao, Xinmiao
    Liu, Dan
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 20 (03) : 2743 - 2751
  • [30] Is There a Role for Decompression Alone for Treating Symptomatic Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Systematic Review
    Joaquim, Andrei F.
    Milano, Jeronimo B.
    Ghizoni, Enrico
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (05): : 191 - 202