Effect of Posterolateral Bundle Graft Fixation Angles on Clinical Outcomes in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:9
作者
Koga, Hideyuki [1 ]
Muneta, Takeshi [1 ]
Yagishita, Kazuyoshi [1 ]
Watanabe, Toshifumi [1 ]
Mochizuki, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Horie, Masafumi [1 ]
Nakamura, Tomomasa [1 ]
Otabe, Koji [1 ]
Sekiya, Ichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ Hosp Med, Tokyo 1138519, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
double bundle; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; graft fixation angle; randomized controlled trial; KNEE FLEXION ANGLES; TENSION; LAXITY; CURVES; TENDON;
D O I
10.1177/0363546514567069
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, no consensus exists on an optimal setting for the posterolateral bundle (PLB) graft fixation angles. Hypothesis: Different PLB fixation angles would affect clinical outcomes in DB ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: This study prospectively included 90 patients who underwent primary DB ACL reconstruction with an autologous semitendinosus tendon. The PLB fixation angles were randomly set as follows: 0 degrees of flexion (P0; n = 30), 20 degrees (P20; n = 30), and 45 degrees (P45; n = 30). In all groups, the anteromedial bundle was fixed at 20 degrees of flexion. The following evaluation methods were used at the preoperative period and at 3, 6, and 9 months and 1 and 2 years after the surgery: clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer measurement, muscle strength, Tegner score, Lysholm score, and subjective rating scale regarding patient satisfaction and sports performance levels. Graft retear, contralateral ACL tear, and additional meniscus surgery were also recorded. Results: Seventy-five patients (P0, n = 25; P20, n = 26; P45, n = 24) who were followed for 2 years were evaluated. Preoperatively, there were no differences among the groups. Postoperatively, pivot-shift test results in the P0 and P20 groups were better than those in the P45 group (P0, n = 23 graded negative and 2 graded 1+; P20, n = 23 and 2; P45, n = 15 and 7, respectively; P0 vs P45: P = .038 and P20 vs P45: P = .038). Average KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements were better in the P20 group than in the P45 group (P0, 0.4 mm; P20, 0.3 mm; P45, 1.3 mm; P20 vs P45: P = .048), and there were more patients with graft failure (KT-1000 measurement, 4 mm) in the P45 group (n = 3) than the P0 and P20 groups (each, n = 0). There were no significant differences in range of motion, other laxity tests, muscle strength, Tegner score, Lysholm score, subjective rating scale, or additional surgery. Conclusion: In DB ACL reconstruction, when the anteromedial bundle was fixed at 20 degrees of flexion, fixation of the PLB at 45 degrees was worse than fixation at 0 degrees and 20 degrees with respect to anterior and rotational stability during the 2-year follow-up. KT-1000 arthrometer measurements and pivot-shift test results were significantly worse, and there were more patients with graft failure in the P45 group. There were no differences among groups in other findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1164
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Clinical Outcome of Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    van der Merwe, Willem M.
    von Bormann, Richard P. B.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 16 (03) : 171 - 175
  • [12] Effect of fixation angle and graft tension in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on knee biomechanics
    Yusuke Sasaki
    Shih-Sheng Chang
    Masataka Fujii
    Daisuke Araki
    Junjun Zhu
    Brandon Marshall
    Monica Linde-Rosen
    Patrick Smolinski
    Freddie H. Fu
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 2892 - 2898
  • [13] Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Jarvela, Timo
    Jarvela, Sally
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (01) : 81 - +
  • [14] Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Buoncristiani, Anthony M.
    Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
    Starman, James S.
    Ferretti, Mario
    Fu, Freddie H.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (09) : 1000 - 1006
  • [15] Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Siebold, Rainer
    Dehler, Carsten
    Ellert, Thomas
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (02) : 137 - 145
  • [16] Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Kato, Yuki
    Hoshino, Yuichi
    Ingham, Sheila J. M.
    Fu, Freddie H.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2010, 15 (02) : 269 - 276
  • [17] Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Lattermann, Christian
    Zelle, Boris A.
    Ferretti, Mario
    Chhabra, Anikar
    Fu, Freddie H.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 23 (03) : 192 - 198
  • [18] Anatomical Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Boris A. Zelle
    Peter U. Brucker
    Matthew T. Feng
    Freddie H. Fu
    Sports Medicine, 2006, 36 : 99 - 108
  • [19] A Modest Proposal for a Clinical Trial on Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    D'Agostino, Ralph B., Jr.
    Lubowitz, James H.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    Poehling, Gary G.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (03) : 301 - 304
  • [20] Effect of Notchplasty in Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Koga, Hideyuki
    Muneta, Takeshi
    Yagishita, Kazuyoshi
    Watanabe, Toshifumi
    Mochizuki, Tomoyuki
    Horie, Masafumi
    Nakamura, Tomomasa
    Sekiya, Ichiro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (08) : 1813 - 1821