Social Justice as a Principle of Social Security

被引:0
作者
Kuchma, Olha [1 ]
机构
[1] Taras Shevchenko Natl Univ Kyiv, Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
Social justice; social policy; migrants; social security; compensation coefficient;
D O I
10.1590/2317-6172202224
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to determine the impact of social justice on the volume, types, and amount of social security in the distribution of benefits in society. This study approaches the direction of social policy in the state and the place of social justice in the priorities of legislative activity. Failure to keep a balance between the interests of different classes of the population leads to confrontation in society and conflicts with the authorities. The state is constantly facing challenges that require a review of traditional social security conditions. Deteriorating demographic situation and other reasons that affect the amount of funding for the social sphere are forcing authorities to make unpopular decisions that worsen the conditions of social security. Therefore, the principle of social justice and the principle of legitimate expectation must be observed when changing the legislation in the field of social security. This article proposes the definition of the compensation coefficient in legislation, and its amount should be set in a bill to amend the legislation in the field of social security. This paper also focuses on the problem of social justice in providing social security to migrants.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
ALEXY, 2002, THEORY CONSTITUTIONA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULING OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION N. 26-P. On the case concerning the constitutionality of part one of article 153 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaints of citizens D. V. Apukhtin, K. K. Bagirov, and others
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1964, European Code of Social Security
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DECISION 3 RP 2013
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, DECISION N 4 P2007
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Constitutional Court Decisions U -I-6/17 of 20
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, DECISION 18 2016
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, DECISION 1 38 2016
[9]  
CHERENKO L. M., 2016, DEMOGRAPHY SOCIAL EC, P130
[10]  
Clipa O., 2014, ED UKRAINE