Calibrate your confidence in research findings: A tutorial on improving research methods and practices

被引:58
作者
Frost, Aline da Silva [1 ]
Ledgerwood, Alison [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
statistical power; preregistration; preanalysis plan; open science; replicability; positive predictive value; STATISTICAL POWER; SAMPLE-SIZE; PUBLICATION BIAS; SPECIAL SECTION; TRADE-OFF; CRISIS; REPLICABILITY; RELIABILITY; INCENTIVES; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1017/prp.2020.7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article provides an accessible tutorial with concrete guidance for how to start improving research methods and practices in your lab. Following recent calls to improve research methods and practices within and beyond the borders of psychological science, resources have proliferated across book chapters, journal articles, and online media. Many researchers are interested in learning more about cutting-edge methods and practices but are unsure where to begin. In this tutorial, we describe specific tools that help researchers calibrate their confidence in a given set of findings. In Part I, we describe strategies for assessing the likely statistical power of a study, including when and how to conduct different types of power calculations, how to estimate effect sizes, and how to think about power for detecting interactions. In Part II, we provide strategies for assessing the likely type I error rate of a study, including distinguishing clearly between data-independent ("confirmatory") and data-dependent ("exploratory") analyses and thinking carefully about different forms and functions of preregistration.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty [J].
Anderson, Samantha F. ;
Kelley, Ken ;
Maxwell, Scott E. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 28 (11) :1547-1562
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, DTSCH ARZTEBL, V115, pA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, DTSCH ARZTEBL, V115, pA
[4]   The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science [J].
Bakker, Marjan ;
van Dijk, Annette ;
Wicherts, Jelte M. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (06) :543-554
[5]   Raise standards for preclinical cancer research [J].
Begley, C. Glenn ;
Ellis, Lee M. .
NATURE, 2012, 483 (7391) :531-533
[6]   Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience [J].
Button, Katherine S. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Mokrysz, Claire ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Flint, Jonathan ;
Robinson, Emma S. J. ;
Munafo, Marcus R. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 14 (05) :365-376
[7]  
Chaiken S., 2012, Handbook of theories of social psychology, V1, P246, DOI [10.4135/9781446249215.n13, DOI 10.4135/9781446249215.N13, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n13]
[8]  
Chartier C., 2018, APS OBSERVER
[9]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[10]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences., V2nd, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-5439-0_2, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587, 10.4324/9780203771587]