Sex-specific strategies of resource allocation in response to competition for light in a dioecious plant

被引:55
作者
Tonnabel, Jeanne [1 ]
David, Patrice [2 ]
Pannell, John R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Dept Ecol & Evolut, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Paul Valery Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, EPHE, CEFE,CNRS,UMR 5175, 1919 Route Mende, F-34293 Montpellier 5, France
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Plasticity; Sexual dimorphism; Resource allocation; Light competition; Carbon limitation; SAGITTARIA-LATIFOLIA ALISMATACEAE; WIND-POLLINATED HERB; SIZE DIMORPHISM; MERCURIALIS-ANNUA; BODY-SIZE; REPRODUCTION; TRAITS; POLLEN; COSTS; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-017-3966-5
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The differential plasticity hypothesis suggests that sexual dimorphism in dioecious plants could evolve in response to sex-specific resource requirements for reproduction (i.e., high carbon requirements for ovules and high nitrogen demands for pollen). When resources become limiting during growth, males and females should, therefore, adjust their allocation to resource-harvesting organs differently. To investigate the potential for plants to respond to resource limitation late in life and to test the differential plasticity hypothesis, we grew male and female individuals of the annual wind-pollinated plant Mercurialis annua in a common garden. Late in the growth season, we simulated a change in competition by decreasing plant density in half of the replicates. We measured both allocation to vegetative and reproductive traits and analyzed the relative allocation to reproduction vs. growth. Males and females differentially adjusted their resource allocation in response to varying plant densities, despite the fact that they were reproductively mature. Males maintained the same relative allocation of resource to reproductive vs. vegetative tissues at both densities. In contrast, females reduced vegetative growth proportionally less than seed production at the higher density. Our results highlight the dynamic nature of allocation decisions taken by plants, which respond quickly and in a sexually dimorphic way to changes in their competitive circumstances. The existence of resource 'currencies' limiting male and female functions differently have potentially led to the evolution of sex-specific strategies of resource acquisition and deployment, with females conserving resources for vegetative organs to ensure their future carbon-rich reproduction.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 686
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT IN THE DIOECIOUS SHRUB OEMLERIA-CERASIFORMIS USING NITROGEN, ENERGY AND BIOMASS AS CURRENCIES [J].
ANTOS, JA ;
ALLEN, GA .
AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 1990, 124 (02) :254-262
[2]   VARIATION IN FLORAL SEX ALLOCATION WITH TIME OF SEASON AND CURRENCY [J].
ASHMAN, TL ;
BAKER, I .
ECOLOGY, 1992, 73 (04) :1237-1243
[3]  
Avila-Sakar German, 2012, Int J Evol Biol, V2012, P897157, DOI 10.1155/2012/897157
[4]   Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants [J].
Barrett, Spencer C. H. ;
Hough, Josh .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2013, 64 (01) :67-82
[5]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[6]   EVOLUTION OF DIOECY IN FLOWERING PLANTS [J].
BAWA, KS .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1980, 11 :15-39
[7]   Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: Does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time? [J].
Blanckenhorn, Wolf U. ;
Dixon, Anthony F. G. ;
Fairbairn, Daphne J. ;
Foellmer, Matthias W. ;
Gibert, Patricia ;
van der Linde, Kim ;
Meier, Rudolf ;
Nylin, Soren ;
Pitnick, Scott ;
Schoff, Christopher ;
Signorelli, Martino ;
Teder, Tiit ;
Wiklund, Christer .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2007, 169 (02) :245-257
[8]   Survival costs and reproductive benefits of floral display in a sexually dimorphic dioecious shrub, Leucadendron xanthoconus [J].
Bond, WJ ;
Maze, KE .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1999, 13 (01) :1-18
[9]   ALLOMETRY AND SEXUAL DIFFERENCES IN LEAF SIZE [J].
BOND, WJ ;
MIDGLEY, J .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1988, 131 (06) :901-910
[10]  
Charlesworth D., 1999, Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants, P33, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3_2, 10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3]