A Comparative Reliability Study of Three Fundamental Multilevel Inverters Using Two Different Approaches

被引:32
|
作者
Alavi, Omid [1 ]
Viki, Abbas Hooshmand [1 ]
Shamlou, Sadegh [1 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, POB 16315-1355, Tehran, Iran
关键词
power electronics; reliability; multilevel inverters; failure rate; mean time to failure; redundancy; POWER ELECTRONIC CONVERTERS; FAILURE; PERFORMANCE; TOPOLOGIES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/electronics5020018
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The reliability of power electronic devices and components is very important to manufacturers. In recent years, many researchers have conducted reliability assessments of power electronic devices, yet the reliability of numerous circuits used widely has not been evaluated. This paper presents a comprehensive reliability evaluation of fundamental multilevel inverters. The reliability of the multilevel inverters is analyzed by calculating the mean time to failure for each component. The calculation was performed by two methods (approximate and exact) to achieve better comparisons. The approximate method is similar to the parts count method used in MIL-HDBK-217 reliability standard, and the exact method exhibits the parts stress method. In the exact method, due to the direct relationship between component failure and temperature, we used Matlab Simulink to determine power losses in diodes and switches taking into account the temperature factor. The results determined by the approximate method showed that the three-level cascade H-bridge was the most reliable of the inverters considered. Although the exact method validates those results, and shows that cascade H-bridge (CHB) had a longer lifespan, but the calculated values are different. Therefore, using different approaches for evaluating reliability results in different outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Competitive study on reliability of difference voltage levels of NPC multilevel inverters
    Ghodsi, M.
    Barakati, S. M.
    Sadr, S. M.
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 2018, 54 (17) : 1047 - 1048
  • [2] Universal Control Strategy for Three Different Multilevel Inverters
    Rasoanarivo, Ignace
    Nahid-Mobarakeh, Babak
    Pierfederici, Serge
    2010 IEEE INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS SOCIETY ANNUAL MEETING, 2010,
  • [3] Comparative study of single-phase multilevel cascaded transformerless inverters with different modulation methods
    Mollahasanoglu, Hakki
    Mollahasanoglu, Merve
    Ozkop, Emre
    ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL-JESTECH, 2024, 51
  • [4] Reliability Estimation from Test Data Using Two Different Approaches
    Hersant, J.
    Cloupet, S.
    Guerin, F.
    Chevalier, L.
    2012 PROCEEDINGS - ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS), 2012,
  • [5] Comparative study of H-bridge multilevel inverters dedicated to PV
    Fri, Abdelaziz
    El Bachtiri, Rachid
    El Ghzizal, Abdelaziz
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2013 INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE (IRSEC), 2013, : 67 - 72
  • [6] Comparative study of multilevel inverters under unbalanced voltage in a single DC link
    Maswood, Ali I.
    Gabriel, Ooi H. P.
    Al Ammar, Essam
    IET POWER ELECTRONICS, 2013, 6 (08) : 1530 - 1543
  • [7] Two Compact Three-Phase Multilevel Inverters for Low-Voltage Applications
    Aghaei, Hadi
    Babaei, Ebrahim
    Sharifian, Mohammad Bagher Bannae
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2023, 38 (01) : 647 - 656
  • [8] A comparative study of three leadership approaches in India
    Palrecha, Rita
    Spangler, William D.
    Yammarino, Francis J.
    LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2012, 23 (01) : 146 - 162
  • [9] A comparative study of various metamodeling approaches in tunnel reliability analysis
    Thapa, Axay
    Roy, Atin
    Chakraborty, Subrata
    PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2024, 75
  • [10] Comparative Study Between Different SVPWM Algorithms for NPC Inverters in Terms of Common Mode Voltage Reduction
    Ezzeddine, Kawther
    Hamouda, Mahmoud
    Al-Haddad, Kamal
    IECON 2017 - 43RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2017, : 6458 - 6463