A step-by-step method to classify corporate sustainability practices based on the Signaling Theory

被引:7
作者
Amaya, Norbey [1 ]
Lopez-Santamaria, Monica [1 ]
Cuero Acosta, Yonni Angel [1 ]
Grueso Hinestroza, Merlin Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rosario, Sch Management & Business, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
Corporate sustainability; Qualitative research; Qualitative content analysis; Intent signals; Necessity signals; Camouflage signals;
D O I
10.1016/j.mex.2021.101538
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The "Signaling Theory" is a theoretical framework that investigates the content reported in sustainability reports, considering that through signaling, companies can influence stakeholders' perceptions, create a competitive advantage and positively impact their corporate image. Signals can be classified into three types: camouflage, intent and necessity. By analyzing their sustainability reports, this study presents a step-by-step approach to classifying sustainability practices reported by companies according to the aforementioned types of signals. We propose a step-by-step approach based on a thematic and qualitative analysis that encourages replication by the research community. Details in the study will validate the proposed method and consider the lessons learned. A method is proposed that allows the sustainability practices reported by companies to be classified into camouflage, intent and necessity signals through their sustainability reports. A seven-step process for thematic analysis is described based on a qualitative research approach for achieving the above-mentioned goal. The classification of sustainability practices into the camouflage typology is a challenging process, as it tends to be biased, hence the identification of this type of signals in comparison with those of intent and necessity requires the adoption of measures that guarantee the reduction of bias on the part of the researcher. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, G4 sustainability reporting guidelines: Implementation manual
[2]  
Arbelaez M., 2014, Revista de Investigaciones UCM, P14, DOI [https://doi.org/10.22383/ri.v14i1.5, DOI 10.22383/RI.V14I1.5, 10.22383/ri.v14i1.5]
[3]   A Cross-Country Investigation of Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability Disclosure: A Signaling Theory Perspective [J].
Bae, Seong Mi ;
Masud, Md. Abdul Kaium ;
Kim, Jong Dae .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[4]   Sustainability reporting assurance: Creating stakeholder accountability through hyperreality? [J].
Boiral, Olivier ;
Heras-Saizarbitoria, Inaki .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 243
[5]   Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method [J].
Bowen, Glenn A. .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (02) :27-+
[6]  
BRAGA J.P., 2009, Revista de Contabilidade da UFBA, V3, P81
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
[8]  
Calderon HernandezG., 2003, Cuadernos de Administracion, V16, P109
[9]  
Ching HY, 2017, SOC RESPONSIB J, V13, P95, DOI 10.1108/SRJ-10-2015-0147
[10]   The Frontstage and Backstage of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Bill [J].
Cho, Charles H. ;
Laine, Matias ;
Roberts, Robin W. ;
Rodrigue, Michelle .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 152 (03) :865-886