Diagnostic value comparison of CellDetect, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and cytology in urothelial carcinoma

被引:10
|
作者
Shang, Donghao [1 ]
Liu, Yuting [2 ]
Xu, Xiuhong [1 ]
Chen, Zhenghao [1 ]
Wang, Daye [2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Friendship Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Dept Pathol, Beijing 100069, Peoples R China
关键词
Urothelial carcinoma (UC); CellDetect; Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH); Cytology; TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA; EAU GUIDELINES; E-CADHERIN; BLADDER; BIOMARKERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12935-021-02169-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a novel CellDetect staining technique, compared with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and urine cytology, in the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma (UC). Methods A total of 264 patients with suspicious UC were enrolled in this study. All tissue specimens were collected by biopsy or surgery. Urine specimen was obtained for examinations prior to the surgical procedure. CellDetect staining was carried out with CellDetect kit, and FISH was performed with UroVysion detection kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions. For urine cytology, all specimens were centrifuged using the cytospin method, and the slides were stained by standard Papanicolaou stain. Results In this study, there were 128 cases of UC and 136 cases of non-UC, with no significant difference in gender and age between the two groups. Results for sensitivity of CellDetect, FISH, and urine cytology were 82.8%, 83.6%, and 39.8%, respectively. The specificity of the three techniques were 88.2%, 90.4%, and 86.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of CellDetect and FISH are significantly superior compared to the conventional urine cytology; however, there was no significant difference in specificity among three staining techniques. In addition, the sensitivity of CellDetect in lower urinary tract UC, upper urinary tract UC, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) were 83.3%, 81.8%, 83.5%, and 72.0%, respectively. The screening ability of CellDetect has no correlation with tumor location and the tumor stage. The sensitivity of CellDetect in low-grade UC and high-grade UC were 51.6 and 92.8%. Thus, screening ability of CellDetect in high-grade UC is significantly superior compared to that in low-grade UC. Conclusions CellDetect and FISH show equal value in diagnosing UC, both are superior to conventional urine cytology. Compared to FISH, CellDetect is cost effective, easy to operate, with extensive clinical application value to monitor recurrence of UC, and to screen indetectable UC.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the diagnosis of bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: the largest single-institution experience to date
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Mann, Mark J.
    Cleary, Ryan C.
    Hubosky, Scott G.
    Bagley, Demetrius H.
    Thumar, Adeep B.
    McCue, Peter A.
    Lallas, Costas D.
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (01) : 8620 - 8626
  • [42] THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF BRONCHOSCOPIC BIOPSY AND BRONCHIAL CYTOLOGY IN LUNG CARCINOMA
    Gocun, F. Pinar Uyar
    Memis, Leyla
    GAZI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (03): : 133 - 137
  • [43] Clinical Utility of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Prediction of Residual Tumor After Transurethral Resection of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma
    Ding, Tao
    Wang, Yin-Kui
    Cao, You-Han
    Yang, Luo-Yan
    UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (04) : 855 - 859
  • [44] What Exactly are the Cytoplasmic Inclusions in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma, and are They of Diagnostic Value?
    Riley, Ellen R.
    Paquette, Cherie
    Leiman, Gladwyn
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 42 (09) : 816 - 818
  • [45] The Utility of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Detection of Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma in Routine Clinical Practice
    Kwak, Kyung Won
    Kim, Sun Hee
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 24 (06) : 1139 - 1144
  • [46] Prognostic value of urinary cytology for detecting urothelial carcinoma recurrence after radical cystectomy
    Rodriguez-Serrano, A.
    Carrion, D. M.
    Gomez Rivas, J.
    Alvarez-Maestro, M.
    Sanchez, S.
    Rodriguez de Bethencourt, F.
    Aguilera Bazan, A.
    Martinez-Pineiro, L.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2021, 45 (06): : 466 - 472
  • [47] Diagnostic value of a comprehensive, urothelial carcinoma-specific next-generation sequencing panel in urine cytology and bladder tumor specimens
    Sun, Tong
    Hutchinson, Lloyd
    Tomaszewicz, Keith
    Caporelli, Mandi-Lee
    Meng, Xiuling
    McCauley, Kathleen
    Fischer, Andrew H.
    Cosar, Ediz F.
    Cornejo, Kristine M.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2021, 129 (07) : 537 - 547
  • [48] Comparison of ImmunoCyt, UroVysion, and Urine Cytology in Detection of Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma A "Split-Sample" Study
    Sullivan, Peggy S.
    Nooraie, Farzad
    Sanchez, Hope
    Hirschowitz, Sharon
    Levin, Mary
    Rao, P. Nagesh
    Rao, Jianyu
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 117 (03) : 167 - 173
  • [49] Comparison of the diagnostic performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22), and their combination model in bladder carcinoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Qindong
    Zhang, Guangjie
    Li, Wuxian
    Wang, Jing
    Sheng, Shangchun
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2019, 12 : 349 - 358
  • [50] Multiple Fluorescences in Situ Hybridization Status in Excreted Urine Improve Diagnostic Efficacy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinomas
    Tang, Feng
    Wang, Xia
    Liu, Tao
    Wang, Hao
    Wan, Ziyu
    Fu, Qiqi
    Zheng, Zhangjie
    Aersi, Madanyeti
    Peng, Jianping
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (02) : 107 - 113