Is Early Cochlear Implant Device Activation Safe for All on-the-Ear and off-the-Ear Sound Processors?

被引:13
作者
Batuk, Merve Ozbal [1 ]
Yarali, Mehmet [1 ]
Cinar, Betul Cicek [1 ]
Kocabay, Aysun Parlak [1 ]
Bajin, Munir Demir [2 ]
Sennaroglu, Gonca [1 ]
Sennaroglu, Levent [2 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Audiol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Otorhinolarygol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Cochlear implant; Early device activation; Fitting; Sound processor; Electrical impedance; MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY;
D O I
10.1159/000503378
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) is an effective treatment option for patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss. When CI first started, it was recommended to wait until at least 4 weeks after the CI surgery for the initial activation because of possible complications. Advances in the surgical techniques and experiences in fitting have made initial activation possible within 24 h. Objectives: To compare the complaints and complications after early activation between behind-the-ear (BTE) and off-the-ear (OTE) sound processors and to show the impact of early activation on the electrode impedance values. Method: CI surgeries performed between March 2013 and July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed from the database. In total, 294 CI users were included in the present study. The impedance measurements were analyzed postoperatively at the initial activation prior to the stimulation, and 4 weeks after the initial activation in the first-month follow-up visit. A customized questionnaire was administered in the first-month follow-up fitting session to caregivers and/or patients who were using CI at least for 6 months. Medical records were also reviewed to identify any postoperative complications. Results: In the early activation group, impedance values were significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.05) at first fitting. At the first-month follow-up, no significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05). The most common side effects were reported to be edema (6.1%) and pain (5.7%) in the early activation group. In patients with OTE sound processors, the rate of side effects such as skin infection, wound swelling, skin hyperemia, and pain was higher than in patients with BTE sound processors; however, a statistical significance was only observed in wound swelling (p = 0.005). Selecting the appropriate magnet was defined as a problem for the OTE sound processors during the initial activation. Conclusion: This study revealed that early activation of CI was clinically safe and feasible in patients with BTE sound processors. When using OTE sound processors, the audiologists should be careful during the activation period and inform patients of possible side effects. The first fitting should be delayed for 4 weeks after CI for OTE sound processors. This current study is the first to report this finding with 5 years of experience in a large cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 284
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Cochlear Implant Device Activation and Programming: 5 Days Postimplantation
    Alsabellha, Rabea M.
    Hagr, Abdulrahman
    Al-momani, Murad O.
    Garadat, Soha N.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (04) : E130 - E134
  • [2] Impedance and Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) Drop within 24 Hours after Cochlear Implantation
    Chen, Joshua Kuang-Chao
    Chuang, Ann Yi-Chiun
    Sprinzl, Georg Mathias
    Tung, Tao-Hsin
    Li, Lieber Po-Hung
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [3] Off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors
    Dazert, Stefan
    Thomas, Jan Peter
    Buechner, Andreas
    Mueller, Joachim
    Hempel, John Martin
    Loewenheim, Hubert
    Mlynski, Robert
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (03) : 1391 - 1395
  • [4] Early Fitting in Cochlear Implantation: Benefits and Limits
    Guenther, Stefanie
    Baumann, Uwe
    Stoever, Timo
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (04) : E250 - E256
  • [5] Feasibility of one-day activation in cochlear implant recipients
    Hagr, Abdulrahman
    Garadat, Soha N.
    Al-Momani, Murad
    Alsabellha, Rabea M.
    Almuhawas, Fida A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 54 (05) : 323 - 328
  • [6] Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant
    Henkin, Y
    Kaplan-Neeman, R
    Muchnik, C
    Kronenberg, J
    Hildesheimer, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 67 (08) : 873 - 880
  • [7] Lenarz Thomas, 2017, Laryngorhinootologie, V96, pS123, DOI 10.1055/s-0043-101812
  • [8] Safety and Functional Results of Early Cochlear Implant Switch-On in Children
    Marsella, Pasquale
    Scorpecci, Alessandro
    Pacifico, Concettina
    Resca, Alessandra
    Vallarino, Maria Vittoria
    Ingrosso, Angelo
    Luchenti, Stefania
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (02) : 277 - 282
  • [9] Clinical outcomes with the Kanso off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor
    Mauger, Stefan J.
    Jones, Marian
    Nel, Esti
    Del Dot, Janine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 56 (04) : 267 - 276
  • [10] Newbold Carrie, 2014, Cochlear Implants Int, V15, P191, DOI 10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000050