Involvement in teaching improves learning in medical students: a randomized cross-over study

被引:68
作者
Peets, Adam D. [1 ,2 ]
Coderre, Sylvain [3 ,4 ]
Wright, Bruce [3 ,5 ]
Jenkins, Deirdre [3 ,4 ]
Burak, Kelly [3 ,4 ]
Leskosky, Shannon [3 ]
McLaughlin, Kevin [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Div Crit Care Med, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Ctr Hlth Educ Scholarship, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Off Undergrad Med Educ, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Fac Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Family Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES; PEER; SCHOOL;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6920-9-55
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Peer-assisted learning has many purported benefits including preparing students as educators, improving communication skills and reducing faculty teaching burden. But comparatively little is known about the effects of teaching on learning outcomes of peer educators in medical education. Methods: One hundred and thirty-five first year medical students were randomly allocated to 11 small groups for the Gastroenterology/Hematology Course at the University of Calgary. For each of 22 sessions, two students were randomly selected from each group to be peer educators. Students were surveyed to estimate time spent preparing as peer educator versus group member. Students completed an end-of-course 94 question multiple choice exam. A paired t-test was used to compare performance on clinical presentations for which students were peer educators to those for which they were not. Results: Preparation time increased from a mean (SD) of 36 (33) minutes baseline to 99 (60) minutes when peer educators (Cohen's d = 1.3; p < 0.001). The mean score (SD) for clinical presentations in which students were peer educators was 80.7% (11.8) compared to 77.6% (6.9) for those which they were not (d = 0.33; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Our results suggest that involvement in teaching small group sessions improves medical students' knowledge acquisition and retention.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   ON THE COGNITIVE BENEFITS OF TEACHING [J].
BARGH, JA ;
SCHUL, Y .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 72 (05) :593-604
[2]   Twelve tips for blueprinting [J].
Coderre, Sylvain ;
Woloschuk, Wayne ;
Mclaughlin, Kevin .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2009, 31 (04) :359-361
[3]  
COHEN PA, 1982, AM EDUC RES J, V19, P237, DOI 10.3102/00028312019002237
[4]   Why medical students should learn how to teach [J].
Dandavino, M. ;
Snell, Linda ;
Wiseman, Jeffrey .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (06) :558-565
[5]  
De Grave W S., 1990, Innovation in Medical Education. An Evaluation of Its Present Status, P123
[6]   PEER TEACHING - ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT OF TEACHER-LED VERSUS STUDENT-LED DISCUSSION GROUPS [J].
DEVOLDER, ML ;
DEGRAVE, WS ;
GIJSELAERS, WIM .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1985, 14 (06) :643-650
[7]   Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs [J].
Dunlap, WP ;
Cortina, JM ;
Vaslow, JB ;
Burke, MJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 1 (02) :170-177
[8]   CONCEPT-ATTAINMENT BY PAIRS AND INDIVIDUALS AS A FUNCTION OF VOCALIZATION [J].
DURLING, R ;
SCHICK, C .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 68 (01) :83-91
[9]   Student-led tutorials in problem-based learning: educational outcomes and students' perceptions [J].
Kassab, S ;
Abu-Hijleh, MF ;
Al-Shboul, Q ;
Hamdy, H .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2005, 27 (06) :521-526
[10]   DEVELOPING A CLINICAL PRESENTATION CURRICULUM AT THE UNIVERSITY-OF-CALGARY [J].
MANDIN, H ;
HARASYM, P ;
EAGLE, C ;
WATANABE, M .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1995, 70 (03) :186-193