Comparative study of three types of microbial fuel cell

被引:192
作者
Ieropoulos, IA [1 ]
Greenman, J
Melhuish, C
Hart, J
机构
[1] Univ W England, CEMS Fac, IAS Lab, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[2] Univ W England, Fac Sci Appl, Sch Human & Analyt Sci, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
关键词
microbial fuel cells; dye mediators; sulphide; anodophillic bacteria; redox potential;
D O I
10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.03.006
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Three different generations (Gen-I, -II and -III) of microbial fuel cell (MFC), distinguished by their historical development and mechanisms of electron transfer, were compared. Gen-I utilised synthetic redox mediators combined with Escherichia coli. In contrast, the Gen-II exemplar utilised the natural mediating properties of sulphate/sulphide with the sulphate reducing species Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Gen-III MFCs were based on the anodophillic species Geobacter sulfurreducens and required no soluble mediator. Each type of MFC was operated under similar environmental conditions. In terms of substrate to power conversion efficiency, Gen-II was most efficient (64.52%), followed by Gen-III (47.38%) and Gen-I (28.12%). When output was expressed as power/unit of cells, Gen-III was 28-fold higher by comparison (33.72 x 10(15) e/mu g cells). For comparative purposes, these results were produced using equal rather than optimal circuit loads. Under optimal loading conditions, Gen-III produced on average five-fold higher power than under equal load and the conversion efficiency was 95%. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first time that these three types of MFC have been experimentally compared under similar conditions. Gen-II and -III but not Gen-I may be used advantageously in wastewater treatment and power generation from organic matter. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 245
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells
    Chaudhuri, SK
    Lovley, DR
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 21 (10) : 1229 - 1232
  • [12] Cohen B., 1931, J BACTERIOL, V21, P18, DOI DOI 10.1128/JB.25.1.19-21.1933
  • [13] Physiologic studies with the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans: Evaluation for use in a biofuel cell
    Cooney, MJ
    Roschi, E
    Marison, IW
    Comninellis, C
    vonStockar, U
    [J]. ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 18 (05) : 358 - 365
  • [14] Renal cell neoplasia
    Delahunt, B
    Eble, JN
    [J]. PATHOLOGY, 2002, 34 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [15] Operational parameters affecting the performance of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell
    Gil, GC
    Chang, IS
    Kim, BH
    Kim, M
    Jang, JK
    Park, HS
    Kim, HJ
    [J]. BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 2003, 18 (04) : 327 - 334
  • [16] HABERMANN W, 1991, APPL MICROBIOL BIOT, V35, P128, DOI 10.1007/BF00180650
  • [17] HALME A, 1998, P 7 INT C COMP APPL, P462
  • [18] HALME A, 2000, SMALL FUEL CELLS BAT
  • [19] Ieropoulos I., 2003, P AISB 03 2 INT S IM, P191
  • [20] Construction and operation of a novel mediator- and membrane-less microbial fuel cell
    Jang, JK
    Pham, TH
    Chang, IS
    Kang, KH
    Moon, H
    Cho, KS
    Kim, BH
    [J]. PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 39 (08) : 1007 - 1012