A framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services

被引:70
作者
Felipe-Lucia, Maria R. [1 ]
Comin, Francisco A. [2 ]
Escalera-Reyes, Javier [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Pirenaico Ecol CSIC, Jaca 22700, Huesca, Spain
[2] Inst Pirenaico Ecol CSIC, Zaragoza 50192, Spain
[3] Univ Pablo Olavide, Seville 41013, Spain
关键词
Social evaluation; Stakeholder; Ecosystem services flow; Ecosystem services ranking; Social perception; TRADE-OFFS; VALUES; ASSESSMENTS; RESILIENCE; LANDSCAPES; PERCEPTION; ECOLOGISTS; KNOWLEDGE; ECONOMICS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-014-0555-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Methods to assess ecosystem services using ecological or economic approaches are considerably better defined than methods for the social approach. To identify why the social approach remains unclear, we reviewed current trends in the literature. We found two main reasons: (i) the cultural ecosystem services are usually used to represent the whole social approach, and (ii) the economic valuation based on social preferences is typically included in the social approach. Next, we proposed a framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services that provides alternatives to economics methods, enables comparison across studies, and supports decision-making in land planning and management. The framework includes the agreements emerged from the review, such as considering spatial-temporal flows, including stakeholders from all social ranges, and using two complementary methods to value ecosystem services. Finally, we provided practical recommendations learned from the application of the proposed framework in a case study.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 318
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]   Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales [J].
Feld, Christian K. ;
da Silva, Pedro Martins ;
Sousa, Jose Paulo ;
de Bello, Francesco ;
Bugter, Rob ;
Grandin, Ulf ;
Hering, Daniel ;
Lavorel, Sandra ;
Mountford, Owen ;
Pardo, Isabel ;
Paertel, Meelis ;
Roembke, Joerg ;
Sandin, Leonard ;
Jones, K. Bruce ;
Harrison, Paula .
OIKOS, 2009, 118 (12) :1862-1871
[22]  
Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO
[23]  
2
[24]   THE WORTH OF A SONGBIRD - ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS AS A POST-NORMAL SCIENCE [J].
FUNTOWICZ, SO ;
RAVETZ, JR .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 10 (03) :197-207
[25]   The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach [J].
Garcia-Llorente, Marina ;
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Iniesta-Arandia, Irene ;
Lopez-Santiago, Cesar A. ;
Aguilera, Pedro A. ;
Montes, Carlos .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2012, 19-20 :136-146
[26]   Benefits and and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: Some stakeholder perspectives [J].
Hauck, Jennifer ;
Goerg, Christoph ;
Varjopuro, Riku ;
Ratamaki, Outi ;
Jax, Kurt .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2013, 25 :13-21
[27]   Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services [J].
Hein, Lars ;
van Koppen, Kris ;
de Groot, Rudolf S. ;
van Ierland, Ekko C. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (02) :209-228
[28]   Synergies and tradeoffs in how managers, scientists, and fishers value coral reef ecosystem services [J].
Hicks, Christina C. ;
Graham, Nicholas A. J. ;
Cinner, Joshua E. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (06) :1444-1453
[29]  
Hicks CC, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
[30]  
Kremen C, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P540, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0540:ACTEMA]2.0.CO