A framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services

被引:67
作者
Felipe-Lucia, Maria R. [1 ]
Comin, Francisco A. [2 ]
Escalera-Reyes, Javier [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Pirenaico Ecol CSIC, Jaca 22700, Huesca, Spain
[2] Inst Pirenaico Ecol CSIC, Zaragoza 50192, Spain
[3] Univ Pablo Olavide, Seville 41013, Spain
关键词
Social evaluation; Stakeholder; Ecosystem services flow; Ecosystem services ranking; Social perception; TRADE-OFFS; VALUES; ASSESSMENTS; RESILIENCE; LANDSCAPES; PERCEPTION; ECOLOGISTS; KNOWLEDGE; ECONOMICS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-014-0555-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Methods to assess ecosystem services using ecological or economic approaches are considerably better defined than methods for the social approach. To identify why the social approach remains unclear, we reviewed current trends in the literature. We found two main reasons: (i) the cultural ecosystem services are usually used to represent the whole social approach, and (ii) the economic valuation based on social preferences is typically included in the social approach. Next, we proposed a framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services that provides alternatives to economics methods, enables comparison across studies, and supports decision-making in land planning and management. The framework includes the agreements emerged from the review, such as considering spatial-temporal flows, including stakeholders from all social ranges, and using two complementary methods to value ecosystem services. Finally, we provided practical recommendations learned from the application of the proposed framework in a case study.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 318
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [21] Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales
    Feld, Christian K.
    da Silva, Pedro Martins
    Sousa, Jose Paulo
    de Bello, Francesco
    Bugter, Rob
    Grandin, Ulf
    Hering, Daniel
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Mountford, Owen
    Pardo, Isabel
    Paertel, Meelis
    Roembke, Joerg
    Sandin, Leonard
    Jones, K. Bruce
    Harrison, Paula
    [J]. OIKOS, 2009, 118 (12) : 1862 - 1871
  • [22] Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO
  • [23] 2
  • [24] THE WORTH OF A SONGBIRD - ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS AS A POST-NORMAL SCIENCE
    FUNTOWICZ, SO
    RAVETZ, JR
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 10 (03) : 197 - 207
  • [25] The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Iniesta-Arandia, Irene
    Lopez-Santiago, Cesar A.
    Aguilera, Pedro A.
    Montes, Carlos
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2012, 19-20 : 136 - 146
  • [26] Benefits and and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: Some stakeholder perspectives
    Hauck, Jennifer
    Goerg, Christoph
    Varjopuro, Riku
    Ratamaki, Outi
    Jax, Kurt
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2013, 25 : 13 - 21
  • [27] Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
    Hein, Lars
    van Koppen, Kris
    de Groot, Rudolf S.
    van Ierland, Ekko C.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (02) : 209 - 228
  • [28] Synergies and tradeoffs in how managers, scientists, and fishers value coral reef ecosystem services
    Hicks, Christina C.
    Graham, Nicholas A. J.
    Cinner, Joshua E.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (06): : 1444 - 1453
  • [29] Hicks CC, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
  • [30] Kremen C, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P540, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0540:ACTEMA]2.0.CO