Intensified dose of cyclophosphamide with G-CSF support versus standard dose combined with platinum in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer a randomised study from the GINECO group

被引:15
作者
Ray-Coquard, I.
Paraiso, D.
Guastalla, J-P
Leduc, B.
Guichard, F.
Martin, C.
Chauvenet, L.
Haddad-Guichard, Z.
Lepille, D.
Orfeuvre, H.
Gautier, H.
Castera, D.
Pujade-Lauraine, E.
机构
[1] Ctr Leon Berard, EA 4129 Sis, F-69008 Lyon, France
[2] Ctr Hosp Aggolmerat Montargeoise, F-45200 Amilly, France
[3] Ctr Hosp, F-19100 Brive La Gaillarde, France
[4] Policlin Bordeaux Nord, F-33300 Bordeaux, France
[5] Ctr Hosp, F-74000 Annecy, France
[6] Hop Hotel Dieu, F-75004 Paris, France
[7] Ctr Hosp, F-71100 Chalon Sur Saone, France
[8] Clin Pasteur, F-27000 Evreux, France
[9] Hop Fleyriat, F-01000 Paris, France
[10] Hop Antomy, CMC Bligny, F-92160 Antony, France
关键词
advanced ovarian cancer; cyclophosphamide; high-dose chemotherapy; epirubicin; randomised trial;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6604026
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ICON3 trial results have suggested that CAP and carboplatin-taxol regimens as first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) yield similar survival. We explored the impact of increased dose of cyclophosphamide in a modified CAP regimen on the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of AOC patients. From February 1994 to June 1997, 164 patients were randomised to receive six cycles every 3 weeks of either standard CEP (S) combining cyclophosphamide (C), 500 mg m(-2), epirubicin (E) 50 mg m(-2), and cisplatin (P) 75 mg m(-2) or intensive CEP (I) with E and P at the same doses, but with (C) 1800 mg m(-2) and filgrastim 5 mu g kg(-1) per day x 10 days. Response was evaluated at second-look surgery. Patient characteristics were well balanced. Except for grade 3-4 neutropaenia (S: 54%, I: 38% of cycles), Arm 1 presented a significantly more important toxicity: infection requiring antibiotics, grade 3-4 thrombocytopaenia, anaemia, nausea-vomiting, diarrhoea, mucositis. Median follow-up was 84 months. DFS (15.9 vs 14.8 months) and OS (33 vs 30 months) were not significantly different between S and I (P > 0.05). Increasing cyclophosphamide dose by more than 3 times with filgrastim support in the modified CAP regimen CEP induces more toxicity but not better efficacy in AOC.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1205
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Optimal therapy of advanced ovarian cancer: carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. cisplatin and paclitaxel (GOG158) and an update on GOG0 182-ICON5
    Bookman, MA
    Greer, BE
    Ozols, RF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2003, 13 (06) : 735 - 740
  • [2] Using the expected survival to explain differences between the results of randomized trials: A case in advanced ovarian cancer
    Buyse, M
    Burzykowski, T
    Parmar, M
    Torri, V
    Omura, G
    Colombo, N
    Williams, C
    Conte, P
    Vermorken, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (09) : 1682 - 1687
  • [3] Cure H, 2004, J CLIN ONCOL, V22, p450S
  • [4] THE EFFECT OF DIAMETER OF LARGEST RESIDUAL DISEASE ON SURVIVAL AFTER PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH SUBOPTIMAL RESIDUAL EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA
    HOSKINS, WJ
    MCGUIRE, WP
    BRADY, MF
    HOMESLEY, HD
    CREASMAN, WT
    BERMAN, M
    BALL, H
    BEREK, JS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 170 (04) : 974 - 980
  • [5] NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS
    KAPLAN, EL
    MEIER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) : 457 - 481
  • [6] Ledermann JA, 2005, J CLIN ONCOL, V23, p456S
  • [7] IMPORTANCE OF MULTIAGENT CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA - DOSE INTENSITY ANALYSIS
    LEVIN, L
    SIMON, R
    HRYNIUK, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (21) : 1732 - 1742
  • [8] MANTEL N, 1959, J NATL CANCER I, V22, P719
  • [9] Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer
    McGuire, WP
    Hoskins, WJ
    Brady, MF
    Kucera, PR
    Partridge, EE
    Look, KY
    ClarkePearson, DL
    Davidson, M
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [10] Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study
    Muggia, FM
    Braly, PS
    Brady, MF
    Sutton, G
    Niemann, TH
    Lentz, SL
    Alvarez, RD
    Kucera, PR
    Small, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (01) : 106 - 115