A NEW PARADIGM FOR SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

被引:536
作者
Durach, Christian F. [1 ]
Kembro, Joakim [2 ]
Wieland, Andreas [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Logist, Berlin, Germany
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Ind Management & Logist, Lund, Sweden
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Operat Management, Supply Chain Risk Management, Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
literature review; methodology; guidelines; paradigm; bias; GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH; PUBLICATION BIAS; CRITICAL REALISM; IMPACT; OPERATIONS; LOGISTICS; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1111/jscm.12145
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
While systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have contributed substantially to developing knowledge in fields such as medicine, they have made limited contributions to developing knowledge in the supply chain management domain. This is due to the ontological and epistemological idiosyncrasies of research in supply chain management, which need to be accounted for when retrieving, selecting, and synthesizing studies in an SLR. Therefore, we propose a new paradigm for SLRs in the supply chain domain that is based on both best practice and the unique attributes of doing supply chain management research. This approach involves exploring existing studies with attention to theoretical boundaries, units of analysis, sources of data, study contexts, and definitions and the operationalization of constructs, as well as research methods, with the goal of refining or revising existing theory. This new paradigm will push supply chain management research to the frontier of current methodological standards and build a foundation for improving the contribution of future SLRs in the supply chain and adjacent management disciplines.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 85
页数:19
相关论文
共 107 条
[21]   THEORY BUILDING IN THE OM/SCM FIELD: POINTING TO THE FUTURE BY LOOKING AT THE PAST [J].
Choi, Thomas Y. ;
Wacker, John G. .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2011, 47 (02) :8-11
[22]   TRIADS IN SUPPLY NETWORKS: THEORIZING BUYER-SUPPLIER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS [J].
Choi, Thomas Y. ;
Wu, Zhaohui .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2009, 45 (01) :8-25
[23]  
Cochrane AL., 1999, EFFECTIVENESS EFFICI
[24]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[25]   Assessing Cumulative Evidence within 'Macro' Research: Why Meta-Analysis Should be Preferred Over Vote Counting [J].
Combs, James G. ;
Ketchen, David J., Jr. ;
Crook, T. Russell ;
Roth, Philip L. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2011, 48 (01) :178-197
[26]   Contribution of Systematic Reviews to Management Decisions [J].
Cook, Carly N. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. ;
Fuller, Richard A. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2013, 27 (05) :902-915
[27]   Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions [J].
Cook, DJ ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Haynes, RB .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (05) :376-380
[28]   GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH - PROCEDURES, CANONS AND EVALUATIVE CRITERIA [J].
CORBIN, J ;
STRAUSS, A .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE, 1990, 19 (06) :418-427
[29]   What works? The role of evidence in public sector policy and practice [J].
Davies, HTO ;
Nutley, SM ;
Smith, PC .
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 1999, 19 (01) :3-5
[30]   An inventory of theory in logistics and SCM research [J].
Defee, C. Clifford ;
Williams, Brent ;
Randall, Wesley S. ;
Thomas, Rodney .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 21 (03) :404-489