A NEW PARADIGM FOR SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

被引:536
作者
Durach, Christian F. [1 ]
Kembro, Joakim [2 ]
Wieland, Andreas [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Logist, Berlin, Germany
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Ind Management & Logist, Lund, Sweden
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Operat Management, Supply Chain Risk Management, Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
literature review; methodology; guidelines; paradigm; bias; GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH; PUBLICATION BIAS; CRITICAL REALISM; IMPACT; OPERATIONS; LOGISTICS; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1111/jscm.12145
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
While systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have contributed substantially to developing knowledge in fields such as medicine, they have made limited contributions to developing knowledge in the supply chain management domain. This is due to the ontological and epistemological idiosyncrasies of research in supply chain management, which need to be accounted for when retrieving, selecting, and synthesizing studies in an SLR. Therefore, we propose a new paradigm for SLRs in the supply chain domain that is based on both best practice and the unique attributes of doing supply chain management research. This approach involves exploring existing studies with attention to theoretical boundaries, units of analysis, sources of data, study contexts, and definitions and the operationalization of constructs, as well as research methods, with the goal of refining or revising existing theory. This new paradigm will push supply chain management research to the frontier of current methodological standards and build a foundation for improving the contribution of future SLRs in the supply chain and adjacent management disciplines.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 85
页数:19
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Alvesson M., 2011, Qualitative research and theory development: Mystery as method
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1962, The structure of scientifc revolutions
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[4]  
[Anonymous], METH EXP CAMP COLL I
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, DOING LIT REV RELEAS
[6]  
[Anonymous], RES SYNTHESIS METAAN
[7]   SPECIAL TOPIC FORUM ON INNOVATION IN BUSINESS NETWORKS FROM A SUPPLY CHAIN PERSPECTIVE: CURRENT STATUS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR FUTURE RESEARCH [J].
Arlbjorn, Jan Stentoft ;
Paulraj, Antony .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2013, 49 (04) :3-11
[8]   MANAGEMENT'S SCIENCE-PRACTICE GAP: A GRAND CHALLENGE FOR ALL STAKEHOLDERS [J].
Banks, George C. ;
Pollack, Jeffrey M. ;
Bochantin, Jaime E. ;
Kirkman, Bradley L. ;
Whelpley, Christopher E. ;
O'Boyle, Ernest H. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 59 (06) :2205-2231
[9]   THE MODELING-EMPIRICISM GAP: LESSONS FROM THE QUALITATIVE-QUANTITATIVE GAP IN CONSUMER RESEARCH [J].
Belk, Russell W. .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2009, 45 (01) :35-37
[10]  
Berger, 1967, The Social Construction of Reality