Using the CNI Model to Investigate Individual Differences in Moral Dilemma Judgments

被引:77
作者
Koerner, Anita [1 ,2 ]
Deutsch, Roland [1 ]
Gawronski, Bertram [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Kassel, Hollandische Str 36-38, D-34127 Kassel, Germany
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CNI model; deontology; individual differences; moral judgment; utilitarianism; UTILITARIAN INCLINATIONS; PROCESS DISSOCIATION; RESPONSES; RELIGIOSITY;
D O I
10.1177/0146167220907203
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Typical moral dilemmas pitting the consequences of a given action against the action's consistency with moral norms confound several determinants of moral judgments. Dissociating these determinants, the CNI model allows researchers to quantify sensitivity to consequences, sensitivity to norms, and general preference for inaction over action regardless of consequences and norms. However, with the currently available set of dilemmas for research using the CNI model, the model is not suitable for studies with individual-difference designs. To overcome this limitation, the current research investigated the suitability of an extended dilemma battery to make the CNI model amenable for individual-difference research, examining relations of its parameters with psychopathy, empathic concern, need for cognition, self-reported utilitarianism, behavioral activation/inhibition, moral identity, and religiosity. The results support the suitability of the CNI model for individual-difference research with the extended dilemma battery, providing more nuanced insights into the underpinnings of individual differences in moral dilemma judgments.
引用
收藏
页码:1392 / 1407
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[11]   Sex differences in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder - A review and integration [J].
Cale, EM ;
Lilienfeld, SO .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2002, 22 (08) :1179-1207
[12]   BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION, BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION, AND AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO IMPENDING REWARD AND PUNISHMENT - THE BIS BAS SCALES [J].
CARVER, CS ;
WHITE, TL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (02) :319-333
[13]   Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers [J].
Conway, Paul ;
Goldstein-Greenwood, Jacob ;
Polacek, David ;
Greene, Joshua D. .
COGNITION, 2018, 179 :241-265
[14]   Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Moral Decision Making: A Process Dissociation Approach [J].
Conway, Paul ;
Gawronski, Bertram .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 104 (02) :216-235
[15]   Utilitarian preferences or action preferences? De-confounding action and moral code in sacrificial dilemmas [J].
Crone, Damien L. ;
Laham, Simon M. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 104 :476-481
[16]   Integrative Data Analysis: The Simultaneous Analysis of Multiple Data Sets [J].
Curran, Patrick J. ;
Hussong, Andrea M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2009, 14 (02) :81-100
[17]   MEASURING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN EMPATHY - EVIDENCE FOR A MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH [J].
DAVIS, MH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (01) :113-126
[18]   Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles [J].
Epstein, S ;
Pacini, R ;
DenesRaj, V ;
Heier, H .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (02) :390-405
[19]  
Foot P., 1967, OXFORD REV, V5, P5, DOI DOI 10.1093/0199252866.003.0002
[20]   Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors [J].
Funder, DC .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2006, 40 (01) :21-34