Land tenure and differential soil fertility management practices among native and migrant farmers in Wenchi, Ghana: implications for interdisciplinary action research

被引:35
作者
Adjei-Nsiah, S
Leeuwis, C
Giller, KE
Sakyi-Dawson, O
Cobbina, J
Kuyper, TW
Anekoe, M
Van Der Werf, W
机构
[1] Univ Ghana, Fac Agr, Agr Extens Dept, Legon, Ghana
[2] Wageningen Univ, Commun & Innovat Studies Grp, Plant Prod Syst Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] CSIR, Agr Forestry & Fisheries Sector, Accra, Ghana
[4] Wageningen Univ, Soil Qual Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Ghana, Fac Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Legon, Ghana
[6] Wageningen Univ, Crop & Weed Ecol Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
bush fallow; cowpea; pigeon pea; cassava; maize;
D O I
10.1016/S1573-5214(04)80020-4
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
In the past, farmers in the forest-savannah transitional agro-ecological zone of Ghana relied on the bush fallow system for maintaining the productivity of their farmland. However, in recent years population growth-induced pressure on land has increased and farmers have developed various other strategies for improving the productivity of their farmlands. Such strategies have been identified in the context of an interdisciplinary action research project and include rotations with cassava (Manihot esculenta), pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Using a social science model for understanding technical farming practices, this article explains the differential adoption of these locally developed soil fertility management strategies. It transpires that native and migrant communities are captured in a social dilemma situation, which has negative consequences for soil fertility in that promising innovations are not utilized optimally. Based on this research experience, this article concludes with a discussion of the implications for co-operation between natural and social scientists in the context of interactive action research. It is argued, amongst other things, that the essence of such co-operation lies in the critical questioning and influencing of each other's key assumptions and disciplinary research agendas.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 348
页数:18
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ADJEINSIAH S, 2002, CONV SCI PROJ INT WO
[2]  
[Anonymous], AGR LAND USE GHANA
[3]  
ASIAMAH RD, 2000, 200 SOIL RES I
[4]  
Baland J. M., 1996, HALTING DEGRADATION
[5]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[6]  
DEGEUS JG, 1973, FERTILISER GUIDE TRO
[7]  
Guijt I., 1998, The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development
[8]  
Howeler Reinhardt H., 2001, P115, DOI 10.1079/9780851995243.0115
[9]  
Imlay M.J., 1983, MALACOL REV, V16, P11
[10]   Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: Towards a negotiation approach [J].
Leeuwis, C .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2000, 31 (05) :931-959