Spinal decompression with patient-specific guides

被引:3
作者
Burkhard, Marco D. [1 ,4 ]
Farshad, Mazda [1 ,3 ]
Suter, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Balgrist Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Balgrist, Res Orthoped Comp Sci ROCS, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Univ Spine Ctr Zurich, Balgrist Univ Hosp, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Balgrist Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Forchstr 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Spine; Decompression; Spinal osteotomy; Spinal stenosis; Patient-specific; 3D printing; LUMBAR; OUTCOMES; STENOSIS; SURGERY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patient-specific instruments (PSI) have been well established in spine surgery for pedicle screw placement. However, its utility in spinal decompression surgery is yet to be investigated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and utility of PSI in spinal decompression surgery compared with conventional freehand (FH) technique for both expert and novice surgeons. STUDY DESIGN: Human cadaver study. METHODS: Thirty-two midline decompressions were performed on 4 fresh-frozen human cadav-ers. An expert spine surgeon and an orthopedic resident (novice) each performed 8 FH and 8 PSI-guided decompressions. Surgical time for each decompression method was measured. Postopera-tive decompression area, cranial decompression extent in relation to the intervertebral disc, and lat-eral recess bony overhang were measured on postoperative CT-scans. In the PSI-group, the decompression area and osteotomy accuracy were evaluated.RESULTS: The surgical time was similar in both techniques, with 07:25 min (PSI) versus 06:53 min (FH) for the expert surgeon and 12:36 min (PSI) vs. 11:54 (FH) for the novice surgeon. The postoperative cranial decompression extent and the lateral recess bony overhang did not differ between both techniques and surgeons. Further, the postoperative decompression area was signifi-cantly larger with the PSI than with the FH for the novice surgeon (477 vs. 305 mm(2); p=.01), but no significant difference was found between both techniques for the expert surgeon. The execution of the decompression differed from the preoperative plan in the decompression area by 5%, and the osteotomy planes had an accuracy of 1-3 mm. CONCLUSION: PSI-guided decompression is feasible and accurate with similar procedure time to the standard FH technique in a cadaver model, which warrants further investigation in vivo. In comparison to the FH technique, a more extensive decompression was achieved with PSI in the novice surgeon's hands in this study. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The PSI-guided spinal decompression technique may be a useful alternative to FH decompression in certain situations. A special potential of the PSI technique could lie in the technical aid for novice surgeons and in situations with unconventional anatomy or pathologies such as deformity or tumor. This study serves as a starting point toward PSI-guided spinal decompression, but further in vivo investigations are necessary. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Pub-lished by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1160 / 1168
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Boos N., 2008, SPINAL DISORDERS FUN, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-69091-7, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-69091-7]
[2]   Evaluating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of EQ-5D-3L in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Swiss Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study [J].
Burgstaller, Jakob M. ;
Wertli, Maria M. ;
Ulrich, Nils H. ;
Pichierri, Giuseppe ;
Brunner, Florian ;
Farshad, Mazda ;
Porchet, Francois ;
Steurer, Johann ;
Gravestock, Isaac .
SPINE, 2020, 45 (18) :1309-1316
[3]   Three-dimensionally printed vertebrae with different bone densities for surgical training [J].
Burkhard, Marco ;
Furnstahl, Philipp ;
Farshad, Mazda .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 28 (04) :798-806
[4]  
Burkhard MD, 2021, NASSJ, V7
[5]   Safety of spinal decompression using an ultrasonic bone curette compared with a high-speed drill: outcomes in 337 patients [J].
Bydon, Mohamad ;
Xu, Risheng ;
Papademetriou, Kyriakos ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. ;
Wolinsky, Jean-Paul ;
Witham, Timothy F. ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. ;
Jallo, George ;
Bydon, Ali .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 18 (06) :627-633
[6]   Augmented reality-based navigation increases precision of pedicle screw insertion [J].
Dennler, Cyrill ;
Jaberg, Laurenz ;
Spirig, Jose ;
Agten, Christoph ;
Gotschi, Tobias ;
Furnstahl, Philipp ;
Farshad, Mazda .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
[7]   Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a balancing act [J].
Deyo, Richard A. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (07) :625-627
[8]   Trends, Major Medical Complications, and Charges Associated With Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older Adults [J].
Deyo, Richard A. ;
Mirza, Sohail K. ;
Martin, Brook I. ;
Kreuter, William ;
Goodman, David C. ;
Jarvik, Jeffrey G. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (13) :1259-1265
[9]   And doctor, no residents please! [J].
Dutta, S ;
Dunnington, G ;
Blanchard, MC ;
Spielman, B ;
DaRosa, D ;
Joehl, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2003, 197 (06) :1012-1017
[10]   Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study [J].
Farshad, Mazda ;
Betz, Michael ;
Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A. ;
Moser, Manuel .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (03) :738-749