Tumor-Treating Fields for the treatment of glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:21
|
作者
Regev, Ohad [1 ,2 ]
Merkin, Vladimir [2 ,3 ]
Blumenthal, Deborah T. [4 ]
Melamed, Israel [2 ,3 ]
Kaisman-Elbaz, Tehila [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Zlotowski Ctr Neurosci, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Soroka Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Med Ctr, Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Tel Aviv Med Ctr, Neuro Oncol Serv, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
alternating electric fields; glioblastoma; meta-analysis; systematic review; Tumor-Treating Fields; NEWLY-DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA; PHYSICIANS CHOICE CHEMOTHERAPY; ALTERNATING ELECTRIC-FIELDS; RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA; RADIATION-THERAPY; MAINTENANCE TEMOZOLOMIDE; NOVOTTF-100A(TM) SYSTEM; CELL-PROLIFERATION; TTFIELDS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1093/nop/npab026
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Tumor-Treating Fields (TTFields) is an emerging treatment modality for glioblastoma (GBM) Studies have shown a good safety profile alongside improved efficacy in newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM) while a loss clear effect was shown for recurrent GBM (rGBM). Despite regulatory support, sectors of the neuro-oncology community have been reluctant to accept it as part of the standard treatment protocol. To establish an objective understanding of TTFields' mechanism of action, safety, efficacy, and economical implications, we conducted systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Methods. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases.Twenty studies the pre-defined inclusion criteria, incorporating 1636 patients (542 ndGBM and 1094 rGBM), and 118 patien (6403 ndGBM and 5155 rGBM) analyzed for the clinical outcomes and safety endpoints, respectively. Results. This study demonstrated improved clinical efficacy and a good safety profile of TTFields. For ndGBM, pooled median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 21.7 (95%CI =-19.6-23.8) and 7.2 95%CI = 6.1-8.2) months, respectively. For rGBM, pooled median OS and PFS were 10.3 (95%CI =8.3-12.8) and 5.7 5%CI = 2.8-10) months, respectively. Compliance of 75% was associated with an improved OS and the predominant adverse events were dermatologic, with a pooled prevalence of 38.4% (95%CI = 32.3-44.9). Preclinical studies demonstrated TTFields' diverse molecular mechanism of action, its potential synergistic efficacy, and suggest possible benefits for certain populations. Conclusions. This study supports the-use of TTFields for GBM, along side the standard-of-care treatment protocol and provides a practical summary , discussing the current clinical and preclinical aspects of the treatment and their implication on the disease course.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 440
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tumor-treating fields as a fourth treating modality for glioblastoma: a meta-analysis
    Magouliotis, Dimitrios E.
    Asprodini, Eftihia K.
    Svokos, Konstantina A.
    Tasiopoulou, Vasiliki S.
    Svokos, Alexis A.
    Toms, Steven A.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2018, 160 (06) : 1167 - 1174
  • [2] Tumor-treating fields as a fourth treating modality for glioblastoma: a meta-analysis
    Dimitrios E. Magouliotis
    Eftihia K. Asprodini
    Konstantina A. Svokos
    Vasiliki S. Tasiopoulou
    Alexis A. Svokos
    Steven A. Toms
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2018, 160 : 1167 - 1174
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of tumor-treating fields in recurrent glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xiaohui
    Jia, Zetian
    Yan, Yaqi
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2022, 164 (08) : 1985 - 1993
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of tumor-treating fields in recurrent glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaohui Li
    Zetian Jia
    Yaqi Yan
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2022, 164 : 1985 - 1993
  • [5] Treatment of Glioblastoma (GBM) with the Addition of Tumor-Treating Fields (TTF): A Review
    Fabian, Denise
    Eibl, Maria del Pilar Guillermo Prieto
    Alnahhas, Iyad
    Sebastian, Nikhil
    Giglio, Pierre
    Puduvalli, Vinay
    Gonzalez, Javier
    Palmer, Joshua D.
    CANCERS, 2019, 11 (02):
  • [6] Tumor-Treating Fields in Glioblastomas: Past, Present, and Future
    Guo, Xiaopeng
    Yang, Xin
    Wu, Jiaming
    Yang, Huiyu
    Li, Yilin
    Li, Junlin
    Liu, Qianshu
    Wu, Chen
    Xing, Hao
    Liu, Penghao
    Wang, Yu
    Hu, Chunhua
    Ma, Wenbin
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [7] Rationale and Background on Tumor-Treating Fields for Glioblastoma
    Schwartz, Margaret A.
    Onuselogu, Lynnette
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2016, 20 (05) : 20 - 24
  • [8] Association between conflict of interest and published position on tumor-treating fields for the treatment of glioblastoma
    Hayes, Michael J.
    Prasad, Vinay
    JOURNAL OF CANCER POLICY, 2019, 21
  • [9] Enhancing glioblastoma treatment through the integration of tumor-treating fields
    Szklener, Katarzyna
    Bilski, Mateusz
    Nieoczym, Karolina
    Mandziuk, Dominika
    Mandziuk, Slawomir
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [10] The Routine Application of Tumor-Treating Fields in the Treatment of Glioblastoma WHO° IV
    Krigers, Aleksandrs
    Pinggera, Daniel
    Demetz, Matthias
    Kornberger, Lisa-Marie
    Kerschbaumer, Johannes
    Thome, Claudius
    Freyschlag, Christian F.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13