Optimization of electrostatic interactions in protein-protein complexes

被引:50
|
作者
Brock, Kelly
Talley, Kemper
Coley, Kacey
Kundrotas, Petras
Alexovy, Emil [1 ]
机构
[1] S Carolina Governor Sch Sci & Math, Hartsville, SC USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Phys, Computat Biophys & Bioinformat, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1529/biophysj.107.112367
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
In this article, we present a statistical analysis of the electrostatic properties of 298 protein-protein complexes and 356 domain-domain structures extracted from the previously developed database of protein complexes (ProtCom, http:// www.ces.clemson.edu/compbio/protcom). For each structure in the dataset we calculated the total electrostatic energy of the binding and its two components, Coulombic and reaction field energy. It was found that in a vast majority of the cases (> 90%), the total electrostatic component of the binding energy was unfavorable. At the same time, the Coulombic component of the binding energy was found to favor the complex formation while the reaction field component of the binding energy opposed the binding. It was also demonstrated that the components in a wild-type (WT) structure are optimized/anti-optimized with respect to the corresponding distributions, arising from random shuffling of the charged side chains. The degree of this optimization was assessed through the Z-score of WT energy in respect to the random distribution. It was found that the Z-scores of Coulombic interactions peak at a considerably negative value for all 654 cases considered while the Z-score of the reaction field energy varied among different types of complexes. All these findings indicate that the Coulombic interactions within WT protein-protein complexes are optimized to favor the complex formation while the total electrostatic energy predominantly opposes the binding. This observation was used to discriminate WT structures among sets of structural decoys and showed that the electrostatic component of the binding energy is not a good discriminator of the WT; while, Coulombic or reaction field energies perform better depending upon the decoy set used.
引用
收藏
页码:3340 / 3352
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions
    Sheinerman, FB
    Norel, R
    Honig, B
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (02) : 153 - 159
  • [2] Electrostatic properties of protein-protein complexes
    Kundrotas, Petras J.
    Alexov, Emil
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 91 (05) : 1724 - 1736
  • [3] PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS - POSTMODERN COMPLEXES
    BAZAN, JF
    NATURE, 1995, 376 (6537) : 217 - 218
  • [4] Role of the electrostatic interactions in pre-orientation of subunits in the formation of protein-protein complexes
    Kovalev, PV
    Drozdov-Tikhomirov, LN
    Poroikov, VV
    Alexandrov, AA
    JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS, 2004, 22 (01): : 111 - 117
  • [5] Protein-Protein Recognition Control by Modulating Electrostatic Interactions
    Han, Song
    Yin, Shijin
    Yi, Hong
    Mouhat, Stephanie
    Qiu, Su
    Cao, Zhijian
    Sabatier, Jean-Marc
    Wu, Yingliang
    Li, Wenxin
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2010, 9 (06) : 3118 - 3125
  • [6] Electrostatic contribution to the binding stability of protein-protein complexes
    Dong, Feng
    Zhou, Huan-Xiang
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2006, 65 (01) : 87 - 102
  • [7] On the role of electrostatic interactions in the design of protein-protein interfaces
    Sheinerman, FB
    Honig, B
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2002, 318 (01) : 161 - 177
  • [8] The role of electrostatic energy in prediction of obligate protein-protein interactions
    Mina Maleki
    Gokul Vasudev
    Luis Rueda
    Proteome Science, 11
  • [9] The role of electrostatic energy in prediction of obligate protein-protein interactions
    Maleki, Mina
    Vasudev, Gokul
    Rueda, Luis
    PROTEOME SCIENCE, 2013, 11
  • [10] Electrostatic complementarity at the interface drives transient protein-protein interactions
    Greta Grassmann
    Lorenzo Di Rienzo
    Giorgio Gosti
    Marco Leonetti
    Giancarlo Ruocco
    Mattia Miotto
    Edoardo Milanetti
    Scientific Reports, 13