How does longer term participation in agri-environment schemes [re]shape farmers' environmental dispositions and identities?

There is much debate and conjecture over how participation in agri-environment schemes (AESs) (re)shapes farmers' environmental actions, understandings and associated identities. This paper develops a unique, temporally sensitive, qualitative approach of revisiting farms which acts as a corrective to the current, speculative, understandings of how farmers' relationships with AESs change over time. The paper advances Bourdieusian-inspired ideas of the cultural construct of 'good farming' and 'knowledge cultures', bringing in the notion of hysteresis in order to develop a temporally-inflected consideration of farmers and their AES involvement. The findings reveal how, over the 10 year period, constructive interchanges have taken place between farmers and conservation officers, and stress the need, when thinking about the cultural sustainability of AESs, to recognise the multiple forms of capital that farms may produce. Conceptually, the paper reshapes the concept of the good farmer to: (1) recognise the geographically-contingent nature of the term; (2) redefine the concept away from the hitherto predominant focus on farming individuals; (3) give closer appreciation of the multiple forms of capital which constitute the good farmer identity (as well as how these intersect with each other); (4) and offer clearer recognition of how the good farmer ideals may evolve and be redefined over time. The paper moves on to make practical recommendations for those developing and administering AESs. Beyond the consideration of farmers, the paper has implications for wider understandings of environmental behaviours and associated identities. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.