Assessment of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire for use in patients after neck dissection for head and neck cancer

被引:19
作者
Goldstein, David P. [1 ]
Ringash, Jolie [2 ]
Irish, Jonathan C. [1 ]
Gilbert, Ralph [1 ]
Gullane, Patrick [1 ]
Brown, Dale [1 ]
Xu, Wei [3 ]
Del Bel, Ryan [3 ]
Chepeha, Douglas [4 ]
Davis, Aileen M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Radiat Oncol, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Biostat, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK | 2015年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
shoulder impairments; shoulder disability; shoulder scales; Disabilities of the Arm; Shoulder; and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII); Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; HEALTH-STATUS; INDEX; PAIN;
D O I
10.1002/hed.23593
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn this cross-sectional study, the sensibility, test-retest reliability, and validity of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire were assessed in patients who underwent neck dissection. MethodsSensibility was assessed with a questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was performed with completion of the DASH questionnaire 2 weeks after initial completion; validity, by evaluating differences in scores between patients undergoing different types of neck dissections and correlating DASH scores with Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) scores. ResultsThe DASH questionnaire met sensibility criteria. For test-retest reliability analysis, the intraclass coefficient was 0.91. The DASH questionnaire showed differences between patients who underwent accessory nerve-sacrifice and nerve-sparing neck dissection. DASH questionnaire scores strongly correlated with NDII scores (r=-0.86). ConclusionAlthough this study provides preliminary data on some psychometric properties of the DASH questionnaire in patients who have undergone a neck dissection, further assessment of responsiveness and other properties are required. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck37: 234-242, 2015
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 242
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
American Head and Neck Society, 2008, 7 INT C HEAD NECK CA
[2]   Measures of Adult Shoulder Function Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and Its Short Version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) [J].
Angst, Felix ;
Schwyzer, Hans-Kaspar ;
Aeschlimann, Andre ;
Simmen, Beat R. ;
Goldhahn, Joerg .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2011, 63 :S174-S188
[3]  
[Anonymous], HEAD NECK
[4]  
Beaton D E, 2001, J Hand Ther, V14, P128
[5]   Measuring function of the shoulder - A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Richards, RR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (06) :882-890
[6]   Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Bot, SDM ;
Terwee, CB ;
van der Windt, DAWM ;
Bouter, LM ;
Dekker, J ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2004, 63 (04) :335-341
[7]   Early clinical experience with collagen nerve tubes in digital nerve repair [J].
Bushnell, Brandon D. ;
McWilliams, Andrew D. ;
Whitener, George B. ;
Messer, Terry M. .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 33A (07) :1081-1087
[8]  
Dillman D.A., 2009, Internet, Mail, and Mix-Mode Surveys: The Taylored Design Method
[9]   Why choice of survey mode makes a difference [J].
Dillman, DA .
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2006, 121 (01) :11-13
[10]  
Feinstein AR., 1987, THEORY EVALUATION SE, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT1XP3VBC