Environmental information disclosure and green technology innovation: Empirical evidence from China

被引:140
作者
Li, Guangqin [1 ]
Xue, Qing [1 ]
Qin, Jiahong [2 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Bongbu 233030, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Finance & Econ, Shanghai 361005, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental information disclosure; Green technology innovation; DID; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; POLLUTION; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; POLICIES; FDI;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121453
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Environmental information disclosure is a dominant feature of good ecological environment construction, which reflects the emergence of social supervision. In this paper, we employ the Difference in Difference (DID) method, for 289 prefecture level cities in China that allows us to open up new empirical evidence of the effects on green technology innovation. The results indicate that disclosure of environmental information is more likely to promote green technologies, which is measured by green patent application. As substitute indicators, green patent of utility model and invention patent further confirm the result by robust test. To address the potential regional heterogeneity, we find eastern China might be the place where the above three green patent application have their most pronounced effects. Pollution Information Transparency Index (PITI) was designed to spur innovation, which also has been proved in our paper. Furthermore, green innovation environment, pollution charges and industrial structure have been identified as mediator variables, and foreign investment, government education and technology expenditure in terms of capital investment have been testified as moderator variables.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [41] The design and application of a government environmental information disclosure index in China
    Kosajan, Vorada
    Chang, Miao
    Xiong, Xueying
    Feng, Yan
    Wang, Shiwen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 202 : 1192 - 1201
  • [42] Balanced skills and entrepreneurship
    Lazear, EP
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (02) : 208 - 211
  • [43] Environmental non-governmental organizations and urban environmental governance: Evidence from China
    Li, Guangqin
    He, Qiao
    Shao, Shuai
    Cao, Jianhua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 206 : 1296 - 1307
  • [44] Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China
    Li, Pei
    Lu, Yi
    Wang, Jin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 : 18 - 37
  • [45] Public appeal, environmental regulation and green investment: Evidence from China
    Liao, Xianchun
    Shi, Xunpeng
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 119 : 554 - 562
  • [46] How effective are level-based R&D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands
    Lokshin, Boris
    Mohnen, Pierre
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2012, 44 (12) : 1527 - 1538
  • [47] Lorentzen P., 2010, APSA 2010 ANN M PAPE, P4
  • [48] Sustainability of enterprise export expansion from the perspective of environmental information disclosure
    Lu, Juan
    Li, Bin
    Li, He
    Zhang, Yalong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 252
  • [49] Public R&D policies and cost behavior of the US manufacturing industries
    Mamuneas, TP
    Nadiri, MI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1996, 63 (01) : 57 - 81
  • [50] Political Connections and Industrial Pollution: Evidence Based on State Ownership and Environmental Levies in China
    Maung, Min
    Wilson, Craig
    Tang, Xiaobo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 138 (04) : 649 - 659