Effect of povidone-iodine concentration and exposure time on bacteria isolated from endophthalmitis cases

被引:40
作者
Hosseini, Hamid [1 ]
Ashraf, Mohammad Javad [2 ]
Saleh, Masoomeh [1 ]
Nowroozzadeh, Mohammad Hosein [1 ]
Nowroozizadeh, Behdokht [2 ]
Abtahi, Mohammad Bagher [1 ]
Nowroozizadeh, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Poostchi Eye Clin, Poostchi Ophthalmol Res Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
CATARACT-SURGERY; PROPHYLAXIS; ANTISEPTICS; 5-PERCENT; RESISTANCE; MINUTES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.06.030
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the in vitro susceptibility of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis bacterial isolates to different concentrations of povidone-iodine at different exposure times. SETTING: Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: Ocular-fluid samples obtained from patients diagnosed with postoperative endophthalmitis were submitted to a microbiology laboratory for culture. One milliliter of microbial isolate suspension with a McFarland standard turbidity of 0.5 was mixed with 1 mL of 1%, 2%, 5%, and 10% povidone-iodine solutions. After 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 15 minutes of exposure at 37 C, each solution was transferred to appropriate culture media and incubated at 37 C for 24 hours. RESULTS: Organisms were isolated in 30 (68%) of the 44 patients evaluated. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was identified in 14 cases (47%), Streptococcus species in 8 cases (27%), Staphylococcus aureus in 5 cases (17%), Bacillus cereus in 2 cases (6%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 1 case (3%). Higher povidone-iodine concentrations and longer exposure times were more effective than lower povidone-iodine concentrations or shorter exposure in preventing growth of bacterial isolates. The most effective regimens were 5% povidone-iodine for 15 minutes and 10% povidone-iodine for at least 5 minutes. With a high bacterial load, 13% of bacterial isolates remain viable after exposure to 10% povidone-iodine, even with a long exposure time. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that using 5% povidone-iodine for 15 minutes or 10% povidone-iodine for 5 minutes can prevent the growth of most post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis bacterial isolates.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 96
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Effect of lidocaine gel on povidone-iodine antisepsis and microbial survival [J].
Boden, John H. ;
Myers, Mary L. ;
Lee, Thomas ;
Bushley, Matthew ;
Torres, Mark F. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 34 (10) :1773-1775
[2]   The efficacy of 5% povidone-iodine for 3 minutes prior to cataract surgery [J].
Carrim, Zia I. ;
Mackie, Gordon ;
Gallacher, Grace ;
Wykes, William N. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 19 (04) :560-564
[3]   Bacterial endophthalmitis prophylaxis for cataract surgery -: An evidence-based update [J].
Ciulla, TA ;
Starr, MB ;
Masket, S .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (01) :13-24
[4]   Comparison of 5% poviclone-iodine solution against 1% poviclone-iodine solution in preoperative cataract surgery antisepsis: a prospective randomised double blind study [J].
Ferguson, AW ;
Scott, JA ;
McGavigan, J ;
Elton, RA ;
McLean, J ;
Schmidt, U ;
Kelkar, R ;
Dhillon, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 87 (02) :163-167
[5]   DILUTION OF POVIDONE-IODINE [J].
FINLAYSON, N ;
KEMP, R .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1985, 143 (07) :321-321
[6]  
GILMORE OJA, 1977, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V59, P93
[7]  
GOLDENHEIM PD, 1993, POSTGRAD MED J, V69, pS97
[8]   Prospective Randomized Comparison of 1-Day and 3-Day Application of Topical 0.5% Moxifloxacin in Eliminating Preoperative Conjunctival Bacteria [J].
He, Lingmin ;
Ta, Christopher N. ;
Hu, Nan ;
Sinnar, Shamim ;
de Kaspar, Herminia Mino .
JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 25 (04) :373-378
[9]  
Isenberg SJ, 2000, DERMATOLOGY S1, V204, P92
[10]   In vitro comparison of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and povidone-iodine for surgical prophylaxis [J].
Keverline, MR ;
Kowalski, RP ;
Dhaliwal, DK .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (06) :915-916