Italian multicentre study for application of a diagnostic algorithm in autoantibody testing for autoimmune rheumatic disease: Conclusive results

被引:36
作者
Bonaguri, Chiara [1 ]
Melegari, Alessandra [2 ]
Ballabio, Andrea [3 ]
Parmeggiani, Maria [4 ]
Russo, Annalisa [1 ]
Battistelli, Luisita [1 ]
Aloe, Rosalia [1 ]
Trenti, Tommaso [2 ]
Lippi, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Parma Hosp, Diagnost Lab Dept, Parma, Italy
[2] Baggiovara Hosp, Diagnost Lab Dept, Modena, Italy
[3] Piacenza Hosp, Diagnost Lab Dept, Piacenza, Italy
[4] Reggio Emilia Hosp, Diagnost Lab Dept, Reggio Emilia, Italy
关键词
Diagnostic algorithm; Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease; Antinuclear antibodies; Anti-extractable nuclear antigens; Anti-double stranded DNA; GUIDELINES; STANDARDIZATION; ANTIBODIES; REQUEST; ANA;
D O I
10.1016/j.autrev.2011.06.006
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Aim: The presence of specific auto-antibodies in serum (i.e., antinuclear antibodies or ANA, anti-extractable nuclear antigens or anti-ENA, and anti-double stranded DNA or anti-dsDNA) is one of the major criteria in the diagnostics of Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease. As such, the request for these tests has grown exponentially in laboratory practice. The aim of this study is to describe the implementation of a joint laboratory-clinics guideline for reducing clinically inappropriate requests for autoantibody testing in a broad geographic area (Parma, Modena, Piacenza, Reggio-Emilia) for the diagnosis of Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease. Methods: This study, supported by a Regional grant for innovative research projects started in January 2008, is an observational research aimed at comparing the number of ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ENA testing as well as the percentage of positive test results before and after implementation of the diagnostic algorithm in hospitalized patients. A multidisciplinary team consisting of clinical immunologist and laboratory scientists was established, with the aim of collecting and analysing diagnostic criteria, clinical needs, laboratory report formats, analytical procedures, as well as the number of tests performed. The laboratory results and the clinical protocol were both validated by data emerging from the clinical follow-up studies. Results: A joint guideline for auto-antibody testing, placing ANA test at the first level, has been developed and implemented since January 2009. The results for the period January-June 2009 (12,738 tests) were compared with those of the same period in 2008 (13,067 tests). A significant reduction in the number of anti-dsDNA (-26%) and anti-ENA (-15%) was observed. The percentage of second-level tests positivity after implementation of the diagnostic protocol had also consistently increased for both ENA (13% vs 17%) and dsDNA (9% vs 11%). Discussion: The development and implementation of algorithms for the diagnostics of Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease in hospitalized patients was associated with a reduction in the number of second-level tests, but also with an increased diagnostic specificity. This outcome attests that close collaboration and audit between clinicians, laboratory specialists and healthcare services is effective to develop efficient diagnostic algorithms for both hospitalized patients and outpatients. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Bizzaro N, 2004, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V22, P349
[2]   An Italian Multicenter Study for Application of a Diagnostic Algorithm in Autoantibody Testing [J].
Bonaguri, Chiara ;
Melegari, Alessandra ;
Dall'Aglio, PierPaolo ;
Ballabio, Andrea ;
Terenziani, Paolo ;
Russo, Annalisa ;
Battistelli, Luisita ;
Aloe, Rosalia ;
Camisa, Roberta ;
Campaniello, Giovanna ;
Sartori, Elisabetta ;
Monica, Cesare .
CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES IN AUTOIMMUNITY, 2009, 1173 :124-129
[3]  
*CLIN LAB STAND I, 2006, QUAL ASS IND IMM TES, V11
[4]  
Conrad K, 2011, AUTOIMMUN REV 0518
[5]   Autoantibody Standardization in the Netherlands The Past, the Present, and the Future [J].
Damoiseaux, Jan ;
Tervaert, Jan Willem Cohen ;
Derksen, Ronald ;
Hamann, Dorte ;
Hooijkaas, Herbert ;
Klasen, Ina ;
Kallenberg, Cees ;
Limburg, Pieter ;
Smeenk, Ruud .
CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES IN AUTOIMMUNITY, 2009, 1173 :10-14
[6]   From ANA to ENA: How to proceed? [J].
Damoiseaux, JGMC ;
Tervaert, JWC .
AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2006, 5 (01) :10-17
[7]   Clinical and laboratory aspects of Ro/SSA-52 autoantibodies [J].
Defendenti, Caterina ;
Atzeni, Fabiola ;
Spina, Maria Francesca ;
Grosso, Silvia ;
Cereda, Aldo ;
Guercilena, Giacinto ;
Bollani, Simona ;
Saibene, Simone ;
Puttini, Piercarlo Sarzi .
AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2011, 10 (03) :150-154
[8]   SLE diagnosis and treatment: When early is early [J].
Doria, Andrea ;
Zen, Margherita ;
Canova, Mariagrazia ;
Bettio, Silvano ;
Bassi, Nicola ;
Nalotto, Linda ;
Rampudda, Mariaelisa ;
Ghirardello, Anna ;
Iaccarino, Luca .
AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2010, 10 (01) :55-60
[9]   Historical perspectives on the discovery and elucidation of autoantibodies to centromere proteins (CENP) and the emerging importance of antibodies to CENP-F [J].
Fritzler, Marvin J. ;
Rattner, Jerome B. ;
Luft, LeeAnne M. ;
Edworthy, Steven M. ;
Casiano, Carlos A. ;
Peebles, Carol ;
Mahler, Michael .
AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2011, 10 (04) :194-200
[10]   Clinical significance of anti-Ro52 (TRIM21) antibodies non-associated with anti-SSA 60 kDa antibodies: Results of a multicentric study [J].
Ghillani, P. ;
Andre, C. ;
Toly, C. ;
Rouquette, A. M. ;
Bengoufa, D. ;
Nicaise, P. ;
Goulvestre, C. ;
Gleizes, A. ;
Dragon-Durey, M. A. ;
Alyanakian, M. A. ;
Chretien, P. ;
Chollet-Martin, S. ;
Musset, L. ;
Weill, B. ;
Johanet, C. .
AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2011, 10 (09) :509-513