Digital breast tomosynthesis: Application of 2D digital mammography CAD to detection of microcalcification clusters on planar projection image

被引:0
|
作者
Samala, Ravi K. [1 ]
Chan, Heang-Ping [1 ]
Lu, Yao [1 ]
Hadjiiski, Lubomir [1 ]
Wei, Jun [1 ]
Helvie, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS | 2015年 / 9414卷
关键词
digital breast tomosynthesis; planar projection image; computer-aided detection; microcalcification clusters; digital mammography; nonparametric analysis; JAFROC; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION;
D O I
10.1117/12.2076291
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Computer-aided detection (CAD) has the potential to aid radiologists in detection of microcalcification clusters (MCs). CAD for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) can be developed by using the reconstructed volume, the projection views or other derivatives as input. We have developed a novel method of generating a single planar projection (PPJ) image from a regularized DBT volume to emphasize the high contrast objects such as microcalcifications while removing the anatomical background and noise. In this work, we adapted a CAD system developed for digital mammography (CAD(DM)) to the PPJ image and compared its performance with our CAD system developed for DBT volumes (CAD(DBT)) in the same set of cases. For microcalcification detection in the PPJ image using the CAD(DM) system, the background removal preprocessing step designed for DM was not needed. The other methods and processing steps in the CAD(DM) system were kept without modification while the parameters were optimized with a training set. The linear discriminant analysis classifier using cluster based features was retrained to generate a discriminant score to be used as decision variable. For view-based FROC analysis, at 80% sensitivity, an FP rate of 1.95/volume and 1.54/image were achieved, respectively, for CAD(DBT) and CAD(DM) in an independent test set. At a threshold of 1.2 FPs per image or per (DBT) volume, the nonparametric analysis of the area under the FROC curve shows that the optimized CAD(DM) for PPJ is significantly better than CAD(DBT). However, the performance of CAD(DM) drops at higher sensitivity or FP rate, resulting in similar overall performance between the two CAD systems. The higher sensitivity of the CAD(DM) in the low FP rate region and vice versa for the CAD(DBT) indicate that a joint CAD system combining detection in the DBT volume and the PPJ image has the potential to increase the sensitivity and reduce the FP rate.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A COMPARISON OF DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION OF BREAST CANCER
    Moradzadeh, A.
    Bassett, L. W.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 61 (01) : 128 - 128
  • [42] Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography for Detection of Breast Cancer in Kuwaiti Women
    Asbeutah, Akram M.
    Karmani, Nouralhuda
    Asbeutah, AbdulAziz A.
    Echreshzadeh, Yasmin A.
    AlMajran, Abdullah A.
    Al-Khalifah, Khalid H.
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2019, 28 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [43] Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification
    Petrillo, Antonella
    Fusco, Roberta
    Vallone, Paolo
    Filice, Salvatore
    Granata, Vincenza
    Petrosino, Teresa
    Rubulotta, Maria Rosaria
    Setola, Sergio Venanzio
    Raso, Mauro Mattace
    Maio, Francesca
    Raiano, Concetta
    Siani, Claudio
    Di Bonito, Maurizio
    Botti, Gerardo
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (05): : 860 - 872
  • [44] Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in combination with 2D mammography for the characterisation of mammographic abnormalities
    Sanmugasiva, Vithya Visalatchi
    Hamid, Marlina Tanty Ramli
    Fadzli, Farhana
    Rozalli, Faizatul Izza
    Yeong, Chai Hong
    Ab Mumin, Nazimah
    Rahmat, Kartini
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [45] Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging
    Alistair Mackenzie
    Emma L. Thomson
    Melissa Mitchell
    Premkumar Elangovan
    Chantal van Ongeval
    Lesley Cockmartin
    Lucy M. Warren
    Louise S. Wilkinson
    Matthew G. Wallis
    Rosalind M. Given-Wilson
    David R. Dance
    Kenneth C. Young
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 806 - 814
  • [46] Initial experience with computer aided detection for microcalcification in digital breast tomosynthesis
    Harkness, E. F.
    Lim, Y. Y.
    Wilson, M. W.
    Haq, R.
    Zhou, J.
    Tate, C.
    Maxwell, A. J.
    Astley, S. M.
    Gilbert, F. J.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 9414
  • [47] Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging
    Mackenzie, Alistair
    Thomson, Emma L.
    Mitchell, Melissa
    Elangovan, Premkumar
    van Ongeval, Chantal
    Cockmartin, Lesley
    Warren, Lucy M.
    Wilkinson, Louise S.
    Wallis, Matthew G.
    Given-Wilson, Rosalind M.
    Dance, David R.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 806 - 814
  • [48] Microcalcification Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using an Epipolar Curve Approach
    Ho, Candy P. S.
    Tromans, Christopher E.
    Schnabel, Julia A.
    Brady, Sir Michael
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2010, 6136 : 704 - +
  • [49] False Positive Reduction of Microcalcification Cluster Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Xu, Ning
    Yi, Sheng
    Mendonca, Paulo
    Tian, Tai-peng
    Samala, Ravi
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2014, 9034
  • [50] Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast
    Sudhir, Rashmi
    Sannapareddy, Kamala
    Potlapalli, Alekya
    Krishnamurthy, Pooja Boggaram
    Buddha, Suryakala
    Koppula, Veeraiah
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1118):