A cost-minimisation analysis comparing moxifloxacin with levofloxacin plus ceftriaxone for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia in Germany: results from the MOTIV trial

被引:2
作者
Lloyd, A. [1 ]
Holman, A. [1 ]
Evers, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fourth Hurdle Consulting Ltd, London WC1V 6PL, England
[2] Bayer HealthCare, Wuppertal, Germany
关键词
ceftriaxone; community-acquired infections; costs and cost analysis; levofloxacin; moxifloxacin; pneumonia;
D O I
10.1185/030079908X280400
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study presents a cost-minimisation analysis of moxifloxacin compared to combination treatment with levofloxacin and ceftriaxone in patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Germany. Research design and methods: In the MOTIV study, 738 adult patients with CAP requiring hospitalisation and initial parenteral antibiotic therapy were randomised to sequential IV/oral therapy with either moxifloxacin (n = 368), or levofloxacin and ceftriaxone (n = 365). The primary effectiveness endpoint was the proportion of patients demonstrating clinical improvement 5-7 days after the completion of study treatment. Subgroup analysis considered patients with severe CAP according to pneumonia severity index (PSI) risk class IV and V, microbiologically proven infection, a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and a history of cardiovascular disease. The analysis included the cost of study medication, hospital stay, readmission and inpatient procedures and diagnostics. Event frequency in the study was multiplied by German unit costs to estimate per-patient expenditure. The analysis was conducted from a hospital perspective. Sensitivity analysis investigated the effect of costing from an insurer perspective. Results: No significant difference was found in the percentage of successfully treated patients. Average per patient cost was is an element of 2190 for the moxifloxacin group, and is an element of 2619 for the levofloxacin + ceftriaxone group (difference -is an element of 430, 95% Cl: -is an element of 138, -is an element of 740; p < 0.05). Variability in total costs was wide, with some patients accruing up to is an element of 18000. Medication cost was significantly lower with moxifloxacin than levofloxacin + ceftriaxone (4470, 95% Cl: 4522, 4421), and accounted for between 15 and 30% of total costs. Conclusions: In this analysis of patients hospitalised with CAP in Germany, treatment with moxifloxacin was significantly less costly than treatment with levofloxacin and ceftriaxone.
引用
收藏
页码:1279 / 1284
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Community-acquired pneumonia recovery in the elderly (CAPRIE): Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin therapy versus that of levofloxacin therapy [J].
Anzueto, A ;
Niederman, MS ;
Pearle, J ;
Restrepo, MI ;
Heyder, A ;
Choudhri, SH .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 42 (01) :73-81
[2]   Efficacy and tolerability of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin therapy in pneumonia - Results of the first post-marketing surveillance study with intravenous moxifloxacin in hospital practice [J].
Barth, J ;
Stauch, K ;
Landen, H .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2005, 25 (11) :691-700
[3]   COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA [J].
BARTLETT, JG ;
MUNDY, LM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (24) :1618-1624
[4]   Cost analyses of community-acquired pneumonia from the hospital perspective [J].
Bauer, TT ;
Welte, T ;
Ernen, C ;
Schlosser, BM ;
Thate-Waschke, I ;
de Zeeuw, J ;
Schultze-Werninghaus, G .
CHEST, 2005, 128 (04) :2238-2246
[5]  
Briggs AH, 1997, HEALTH ECON, V6, P327, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199707)6:4<327::AID-HEC282>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-W
[7]  
*COMM PROP MED PRO, 2000, CPMPEWP48299
[8]  
*DGK, 2005, DGK NT 2005 FULL COS
[9]   An economic evaluation of sequential IV/po moxifloxacin therapy compared to IV/po co-amoxidav with or without clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia [J].
Drummond, MF ;
Becker, DL ;
Hux, M ;
Chancellor, JVM ;
Duprat-Lomon, I ;
Kubin, R ;
Sagnier, PP .
CHEST, 2003, 124 (02) :526-535
[10]   Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous (i.v.) and oral moxifloxacin compared with sequential i.v. and oral co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral treatment [J].
Finch, R ;
Schürmann, D ;
Collins, O ;
Kubin, R ;
McGivern, J ;
Bobbaers, H ;
Izquierdo, JL ;
Nikolaides, P ;
Ogundare, F ;
Raz, R ;
Zuck, P ;
Hoeffken, G .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 46 (06) :1746-1754