Evaluation of process limit of detection and quantification variation of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR and RT-dPCR assays for wastewater surveillance

被引:49
|
作者
Ahmed, Warish [1 ]
Bivins, Aaron [2 ]
Metcalfe, Suzanne [1 ]
Smith, Wendy J. M. [1 ]
Verbyla, Matthew E. [3 ]
Symonds, Erin M. [4 ]
Simpson, Stuart L. [5 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water, Ecosci Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Pk, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Earth Sci, 156 Fitzpatrick Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] San Diego State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[4] Southern Methodist Univ, Dept Anthropol, Dallas, TX USA
[5] CSIRO Land & Water, Lucas Heights, NSW 2234, Australia
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Detection limit; Recovery; Concentration method; Enveloped virus; Wastewater; MICROBIAL RISK-ASSESSMENT; REAL-TIME PCR; SOURCE TRACKING; QUANTIFY; RNA;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2022.118132
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Effective wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA requires the rigorous characterization of the limit of detection resulting from the entire sampling process - the process limit of detection (PLOD). Yet to date, no studies have gone beyond quantifying the assay limit of detection (ALOD) for RT-qPCR or RT-dPCR assays. While the ALOD is the lowest number of gene copies (GC) associated with a 95% probability of detection in a single PCR reaction, the PLOD represents the sensitivity of the method after considering the efficiency of all processing steps (e.g., sample handling, concentration, nucleic acid extraction, and PCR assays) to determine the number of GC in the wastewater sample matrix with a specific probability of detection. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the PLOD resulting from the combination of primary concentration and extraction with six SARS-CoV-2 assays: five RT-qPCR assays (US CDC N1 and N2, China CDC N and ORF1ab (CCDC N and CCDC ORF1ab), and E_Sarbeco RT-qPCR, and one RT-dPCR assay (US CDC N1 RT-dPCR) using two models (exponential survival and cumulative Gaussian). An adsorption extraction (AE) concentration method (i.e., virus adsorption on membrane and the RNA extraction from the membrane) was used to concentrate gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2 seeded into 36 wastewater samples. Overall, the US CDC N1 RT-dPCR and RT-qPCR assays had the lowest ALODs (< 10 GC/reaction) and PLODs (<3,954 GC/50 mL; 95% probability of detection) regardless of the seeding level and model used. Nevertheless, consistent amplification and detection rates decreased when seeding levels were < 2.32 x 103 GC/50 mL even for US CDC N1 RT-qPCR and RT-dPCR assays. Consequently, when SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations are expected to be low, it may be necessary to improve the positive detection rates of wastewater surveillance by analyzing additional field and RT-PCR replicates. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the SARS-CoV-2 PLOD for wastewater and provides important insights on the analytical limitations for trace detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of process limit of detection and quantification variation of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR and RT-dPCR assays for wastewater surveillance
    Ahmed, Warish
    Bivins, Aaron
    Metcalfe, Suzanne
    Smith, Wendy J.M.
    Verbyla, Matthew E.
    Symonds, Erin M.
    Simpson, Stuart L.
    Water Research, 2022, 213
  • [2] Comparison of RT-qPCR and RT-dPCR Platforms for the Trace Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater
    Ahmed, Warish
    Smith, Wendy J. M.
    Metcalfe, Suzanne
    Jackson, Greg
    Choi, Phil M.
    Morrison, Mary
    Field, Daniel
    Gyawali, Pradip
    Bivins, Aaron
    Bibby, Kyle
    Simpson, Stuart L.
    ACS ES&T WATER, 2022, : 1871 - 1880
  • [3] Comparison of RT-dPCR and RT-qPCR and the effects of freeze–thaw cycle and glycine release buffer for wastewater SARS-CoV-2 analysis
    Bonnie Jaskowski Huge
    Devin North
    C. Bruce Mousseau
    Kyle Bibby
    Norman J. Dovichi
    Matthew M. Champion
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [4] Comparison of RT-dPCR and RT-qPCR and the effects of freeze-thaw cycle and glycine release buffer for wastewater SARS-CoV-2 analysis
    Huge, Bonnie Jaskowski
    North, Devin
    Mousseau, C. Bruce
    Bibby, Kyle
    Dovichi, Norman J.
    Champion, Matthew M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [5] RT-qPCR and ATOPlex sequencing for the sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA for wastewater surveillance
    Ahmed, Warish
    Bivins, Aaron
    Metcalfe, Suzanne
    Smith, Wendy J. M.
    Ziels, Ryan
    Korajkic, Asja
    McMinn, Brian
    Graber, Tyson E.
    Simpson, Stuart L.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 220
  • [6] Assessing sensitivity and reproducibility of RT-ddPCR and RT-qPCR for the quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
    Ciesielski, Mark
    Blackwood, Denene
    Clerkin, Thomas
    Gonzalez, Raul
    Thompson, Hannah
    Larson, Allison
    Noble, Rachel
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 297
  • [7] Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification by RT-LAMP compared to RT-qPCR
    Minami, Kenta
    Masutani, Ryota
    Suzuki, Youichi
    Kubota, Meri
    Osaka, Naofumi
    Nakanishi, Toyofumi
    Nakano, Takashi
    Ukimura, Akira
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 27 (07) : 1068 - 1071
  • [8] Evaluation of saliva as an alternative diagnostic specimen source for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-dPCR
    Sui, Zhiwei
    Zhang, Yongzhuo
    Tu, Shengjin
    Xie, Jie
    Huang, Wenfeng
    Peng, Tao
    Dong, Lianhua
    Yang, Jiayi
    Ouyang, Yanyan
    Liu, Siyuan
    Li, Longquan
    Wang, Ziquan
    Peng, Ke
    Fang, Xiang
    Dai, Xinhua
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2021, 82 (01) : E38 - E40
  • [9] Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater with RT-qPCR and Chip-Based RT-dPCR: Sewershed-Level Trends and Relationships to COVID-19
    Ma, Daniel
    Straathof, Judith
    Liu, Yijing
    Hull, Natalie Marie
    ACS ES&T WATER, 2022, 2 (11): : 2084 - 2093
  • [10] SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Hospital Wastewater: CLEIA vs. RT-qPCR
    Thongpradit, Supranee
    Chanprasertyothin, Suwannee
    Pasomsub, Ekawat
    Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong
    Prasongtanakij, Somsak
    WATER, 2023, 15 (13)