Comparative Evaluation of Control Loop Performance Assessment Schemes in an Industrial Chemical Process Plant

被引:0
|
作者
Salahshoor, Karim [1 ]
Arjomandi, Rouhollah Khalil [2 ]
机构
[1] Petr Univ Technol, Dept Automat & Instrumentat, Tehran, Iran
[2] SPGC, Assaolyeh, Iran
来源
2010 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5 | 2010年
关键词
Control loop performance assessment; Poor controller tuning; Valve stiction; Random disturbance; Loop interaction;
D O I
10.1109/CCDC.2010.5498754
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Control loop performance assessment is a new-emerging operator support technology that is used to keep automated control loops performing as optimally as possible. This paper addresses this critically important issue through a comprehensive evaluation of common assessment criteria to efficiently explore their capabilities to assess for different control loop scenarios. For this purpose, an integrated computational framework will be developed, including a HYSYS environment to simulate an industrial separator process plant so as to preserve its operational realities. A control loop assessment software package is incoporporated utilizing MATLAB to mimic as an independent supervisory computational platform. To provide an interface link between these two different software environments, an OLE (Object Linking Embedding) protocol has been employed. Extensive simulation test studies have been prepared to explore the performance loop assessment of each individual control loop in the simulated process plant against conservative loop tuning, valve stiction, random disturbance, and loop interaction as the most probable malfunctions in the study. The effectiveness of individual assessment metric to infer for each malfunction ocurrance has been illustrated. It will be shown that each criterion has its own merits and limitations, implying for a collective application of all the considered methods to efficiently detect all the probable malfunctions, reflecting differently in the considered assessment measures for the CLPA task
引用
收藏
页码:2603 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EVOLUTION OF CHEMICAL CONTROL OF PLANT DISEASES - EVALUATION
    VANDERKERK, GJM
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1977, 83 : 3 - 13
  • [32] Holonic control of an engine assembly plant - An industrial evaluation
    Bussmann, S
    Sieverding, J
    2001 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5: E-SYSTEMS AND E-MAN FOR CYBERNETICS IN CYBERSPACE, 2002, : 3151 - 3156
  • [33] Evaluation of chemical pollution in a building site for construction of an industrial plant
    Spirkova, Daniela
    Teplicka, Katarina
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2021, 100 (06): : 561 - 564
  • [34] Implementation and Evaluation of Error Control Schemes in Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks
    Yitbarek, Yonas Hagos
    Yu, Kan
    Akerberg, Johan
    Gidlund, Mikael
    Bjoerkman, Mats
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY (ICIT), 2014, : 730 - 735
  • [35] Closed-loop control of physical properties in an industrial polymerization process
    Williams, DC
    Goeke, RW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1997 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 1997, : 1162 - 1166
  • [36] Refinery-wide control loop performance assessment
    Thornhill, NF
    Oettinger, M
    Fedenczuk, P
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 1999, 9 (02) : 109 - 124
  • [37] Monitoring and assessment of control performance for single loop systems
    Huang, HP
    Jeng, JC
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2002, 41 (05) : 1297 - 1309
  • [38] OPERATOR PERFORMANCE IN CONTROL OF A LABORATORY PROCESS PLANT
    BRIGHAM, FR
    LAIOS, L
    ERGONOMICS, 1975, 18 (01) : 53 - 66
  • [39] An industrial control loop decoupler for process control applications (vol 123, 105138, 2022)
    Hagglund, Tore
    Shinde, Sumit
    Theorin, Alfred
    Thomsen, Ulf
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2022, 125
  • [40] Quantification of Valve Stiction for Control Loop Performance Assessment
    Wang, Guohua
    Wang, Jiandong
    2009 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 1189 - 1194